首页> 外文期刊>Health services management research: an official journal of the Association of University Programs in Health Administration >Patient empowerment: Its implementation and systems within hospitals in England and Greece
【24h】

Patient empowerment: Its implementation and systems within hospitals in England and Greece

机译:患者赋权:英格兰和希腊医院的实施和系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction International health policies recognise patient empowerment, resulting in diverse empowerment models and systems. Research on organisational systems for implementing patient empowerment between countries or from organisational stakeholders’ perspective, however, is limited. Aims and methodology: This paper explores and compares organisational systems and structures for patient empowerment implementation in six acute public hospitals in England and Greece (three in each country), their cross-case and cross-national similarities and differences. It uses a comparative, qualitative, explanatory embedded case study design. Semi-structured interviews with a representative sample of stakeholders (n?=?33) and documentary sources (n?=?79) were analysed with framework. Results Two main patient empowerment themes were identified: (1) organisational leadership, systems, structures; (2) operational structures, services, mechanisms and activities. Generic organisational systems and structures for patient empowerment varied across-cases, but with common organisation of empowerment roles in England and common leadership in Greece. Operational structures, services and mechanisms supporting empowerment varied across-cases and cross-nationally, but with similarities in the main services. Conclusion Implementation of patient empowerment was weaker in Greece than in England, attributable to differing approaches to strategic and operational leadership, limited development of strategies and influential organisational structures. Overall, patient empowerment is well-embedded in organisations with a highly visible patient empowerment profile; commitment to policies and strategy implementation at different levels; strategic and operational leadership investing in dedicated roles with clear authority for patient empowerment, influential empowerment structures and mechanisms.
机译:简介国际卫生政策认识到患者赋权,导致赋权模式和系统多样化。然而,在各国之间或组织利益相关者的角度实施患者赋权的组织制度研究有限。目的和方法:本文探讨并比较了英格兰六急性公立医院的组织系统和结构,在英格兰和希腊(每个国家三个),其跨案例和跨国民族的异同和差异。它使用比较,定性,解释的嵌入式案例研究设计。用框架分析了具有利益相关者代表性样本的半结构化访谈(N?= 33)和纪录片来源(N?=?79)。结果确定了两个主要患者赋权主题:(1)组织领导,系统,结构; (2)业务结构,服务,机制和活动。患者赋权的普通组织系统和结构各种各样的情况,但在英格兰的赋予赋权作用常见组织和希腊的共同领导。支持赋权的运营结构,服务和机制在案例中各种各样地变化,并跨自国,但具有主要服务的相似之处。结论患者赋权的实施在希腊比英格兰较弱,归因于不同战略和业务领导的方法,有限的战略和有影响力的组织结构的发展。总体而言,患者赋权在具有高度可见的患者赋权概况的组织中嵌入了良好的组织;对不同层面的政策和战略实施的承诺;投资患者赋权的明确权威的战略和运营领导力,有影响力的赋权结构和机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号