首页> 外文期刊>Headache >A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Erenumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Japanese Adults
【24h】

A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Erenumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Japanese Adults

机译:Erenumab预防日本成年人偏头痛的随机阶段2研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective A phase 2, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine in Japanese patients was conducted. Background Previous global clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of erenumab in the prevention of migraine. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo or erenumab 28, 70, or 140?mg administered subcutaneously once per month for 6?months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days over months 4‐6 of the double‐blind treatment phase. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (≥50% response) and change from baseline in mean monthly acute migraine‐specific medication treatment days (MSMD) and mean Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6?) scores. Efficacy outcomes were also determined at months 1, 2, and 3. Results Four hundred and seventy five patients were randomized 2:1:2:2 to placebo and erenumab 28, 70, and 140?mg, respectively. Greater reductions in monthly migraine days were observed for erenumab vs placebo with differences of –1.25 (95% CI: –2.10 to –0.41; P ?=?.004), –2.31 (95% CI: –3.00 to –1.62; P ??.001), and –1.89 (95% CI: –2.58 to –1.20; P ??.001) days for erenumab 28, 70, and 140?mg. The odds of having a ≥50% response were 3.2, 5.6, and 4.7 times greater for erenumab 28?mg (95% CI: 1.30‐7.88; P ?=?.009), 70?mg (95% CI: 2.60‐12.06; P ??.001), and 140?mg (95% CI: 2.24‐9.99; P ??.001) than for placebo. Greater reductions from baseline in mean acute monthly MSMD were observed for erenumab vs placebo with differences of –1.07 (95% CI: –1.80 to –0.35; P ?=?.004), –2.07 (95% CI: –2.66 to –1.49; P ??.001), and –2.04 (95% CI: –2.63 to –1.45; P ??.001) days for erenumab 28, 70, and 140?mg. Erenumab 70 and 140?mg also resulted in greater improvements in HIT‐6? scores. The safety profile was similar across treatment groups. The most common adverse event was nasopharyngitis, which occurred in 29.4% of patients in the placebo group and 28.9%‐33.3% of patients in the erenumab groups. Conclusion Monthly subcutaneous injections of erenumab 70?mg demonstrated statistically significant and numerically maximal efficacy with a favorable safety profile, suggesting that erenumab is a potential new therapy for migraine prevention in Japan.
机译:目的是评估日语患者中Erenumab对Erenumab的疗效和安全性的阶段2,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。背景技术以前的全球临床研究表明Erenumab在预防偏头痛中的疗效。方法将患者随机分配到安慰剂或Erenumab 28,70,或140毫克每月一次施用一次6?个月。主要终点在双盲治疗阶段的平均月度偏头发日内从基线变化。次要终点包括在平均每月偏头发日(≥50%的反应)中从基线减少≥50%的患者的比例,并且从平均每月急性偏头痛特异性药物治疗日(MSMD)和平均头痛冲击试验中的基线变化(MSMD)(HIT- 6?)分数。疗效结果也在数月1,2和3.结果中,4.7七十五名患者分别在Applo和Erenumab 28,70和140μmg中随机分配2:1:2:2。对于Erenumab VS安慰剂,观察到每月偏头痛的减少,差异为-1.25(95%Ci:-2.10至-0.41; p?=Δ= 004),-2.31(95%Ci:-3.00至-1.62; p α.2.001)和-1.89(95%CI:-2.58至-1.20;p≤00.001)天,ERENumab 28,70和140毫克为-1.89(95%CI:-2.58至-1.2 001)。 Erenumab 28×mg(95%Ci:1.30-7.88; p?= 009),70?mg(95%Ci:2.60- 12.06; p?& 001)和140×mg(95%CI:2.24-9.99;p≤00.001),而不是安慰剂。 Erenumab VS安慰剂观察到平均急性每月MSMD中基线的增加减少,其差异为-1.07(95%CI:-1.80至-0.35; p?=Δ004),-2.07(95%CI:-2.66到 - 1.49; p?α.001)和-2.04(95%CI:-2.63至-1.45;p≤00.001)天,适用于Erenumab 28,70和140?mg。 Erenumab 70和140?MG也导致HIT-6的改善?得分。安全性曲线横跨治疗组相似。最常见的不良事件是鼻咽炎,其患有安慰剂组的29.4%的患者,28.9%-33.3%的Erenumab群体。结论Erenumab 70的每月皮下注射率为统计上显着的和数值最大功效,表明Erenumab是日本偏头痛预防的潜在新疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号