...
首页> 外文期刊>Headache >American Headache Society Survey About Urgent and Emergency Management of Headache Patients
【24h】

American Headache Society Survey About Urgent and Emergency Management of Headache Patients

机译:美洲头痛社会关于头痛患者紧急和紧急管理的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) visits for migraine are burdensome to patients and to the larger healthcare system and society. Thus, it is important to determine strategies used to prevent ED visits and the common communication patterns between headache specialists and the ED team. Objective We sought to understand: (1) Whether headache specialists use headache management protocols. (2) The strategies they use to try and reduce the number of ED visits for headache. (3) Whether protocols are used in the EDs with which they are affiliated. (4) The level of satisfaction with the coordination of care between headache physicians and the ED. Methods We surveyed via SurveyMonkey members of the American Headache Society Emergency Department/Refractory/Inpatient (EDRI) Section to understand their practice regarding patients who call their office to be seen urgently, and to understand their communication with their local EDs. Results There were 96 eligible AHS members, 50 of whom responded to questionnaires either by email or in person (52%). Of these, 59% of respondents reported giving rescue treatment to their patients to manage acute attacks. Fifty‐four percent reported using standard protocols for outpatients not responding to usual acute treatments. In the event of a request for urgent care, 12% of specialists reported bringing patients into the office most or all of the time, and 20% reported sending patients to the ED some or most of the time for headache management. Thirty‐six percent reported prescribing a new medicine and 30% reported providing telephone counseling some/most/all of the time. Sixty percent reported that their ED has a protocol for migraine management. Overall, 38% were usually or very satisfied with the headache care in the ED. Conclusions A substantial number of headache specialists are dissatisfied with the care their patients receive in the ED. More standardized protocols for ED visits by patients with known headache disorders, and clear guidelines for communication between ED providers and treating physicians, along with better methods for follow‐up following discharge from the ED, might appear to improve this issue.
机译:摘要背景急救署(ED)偏头痛的访问对患者和较大的医疗保健制度和社会来说是繁重的。因此,确定用于预防ed次访问的策略以及头痛专家和ed团队之间的共同通信模式。目标我们试图了解:(1)头痛专家是否使用头痛管理协议。 (2)他们用来试图减少头痛的ED访问数量的策略。 (3)是否在其附属的EDS中使用协议。 (4)在头痛医生和ED之间协调护理的满意度。方法通过美国头痛社会急救署/难治性/住院(EDRI)部分的调查调查,了解他们对呼叫办公室的患者的实践,并了解他们与当地EDS的沟通。结果有96个符合条件的AHS成员,其中50名由电子邮件或亲自回答问卷(52%)。其中,59%的受访者报告给患者救出治疗,以管理急性攻击。第五十四%的百分之据报道,使用标准方案用于门诊患者没有响应通常的急性治疗。如果要求急诊请求,12%的专家报告将患者带入办公室,大多数或所有时间,20%报告向患者发送给ED的一些或大部分时间用于头痛管理。 36%的百分之据报告规定新药,30%报告提供电话咨询某些/最多的时间。六十个百分之据报道,他们的ed有偏头痛管理的协议。总体而言,38%的人通常或非常满意ED中的头痛护理。结论大量的头痛专家对他们的患者在ED中接受的护理是不满意的。已知头痛障碍患者的ED访问的更多标准化协议,以及ED提供商和治疗医师之间的通信的明确指南,以及从ED放电后续跟进的更好方法可能会改善这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号