首页> 外文期刊>Hand surgery: an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand >Comparative Biomechanical Characteristics of Modified Side-to-Side Repair and Modified Pulvertaft Weaving Repair - In vitro Study
【24h】

Comparative Biomechanical Characteristics of Modified Side-to-Side Repair and Modified Pulvertaft Weaving Repair - In vitro Study

机译:改性侧面修复和改良式压力置织修复的比较生物力学特性 - 体外研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Strong surgical repair is the mechanical basis of early mobilization and prerequisite for biological healing following tendon grafting. Side to side and pulvertaft repairs were developed to meets these demands. However, these techniques have later been modified to improve the strength of repair but their characteristics have not been compared. Methods: We compared biomechanical strength of the modified side-to-side (SS) repair with the modified Pulvertaft (PT) repair technique in turkey tendons keeping overlap length, anchor points, type of suture, suture throw and amount of suture similar. Two investigators performed 34 repairs during one summer month to test the tensile strength of the repair using mechanical strength testing machine. Variables measured were maximum load, load to first failure, modulus, load at break, mode of failure, site of failure, tensile strain, tensile stress. The statistical comparison was carried by Levene's test and T test for means. Results: The mean maximum load for modified SS repair was 50.3 (SD 13.7) N and modified PT repair was 46.9 (SD 16.4) N. The tensile stress at maximum load for SS and modified PT repair was 4.7 (SD 4) MPa and 4.2 (SD 3) MPa respectively. The suture cut through was the commonest mode of failure. Conclusions: We found no statistical difference between 2 repairs in load at which they started failing p = 0.16), and maximum load repairs could withstand p = 0.35). Our study uniquely compares two techniques under standard conditions, and contrary to existing evidence found no difference. However, in our opinion the number of anchor points may have a greater impact than number of weaves on the strength.
机译:背景:强大的手术修复是早期动员的机械基础和肌腱移植后生物愈合的先决条件。开发了侧面和刮擦器维修,以满足这些需求。然而,稍后已经修改了这些技术以改善修复的强度,但它们的特性尚未进行比较。方法:我们将改性侧面(SS)修复的生物力学强度与土耳其腱(PT)维修技术进行比较,在土耳其腱保持重叠长度,锚点,缝合点,缝合点,缝合线和缝合线相似的量。两个调查人员在一个夏季进行34台维修,以使用机械强度试验机测试修复的拉伸强度。测量的变量是最大载荷,载荷为首先发生故障,模量,断裂,故障模式,故障部位,拉伸应变,拉应力。统计比较由Levene的测试和T检验携带。结果:改性SS修复的平均最大载荷为50.3(SD 13.7)N和改性PT修复为46.9(SD 16.4)N.SS和改性PT修复的最大负载下的拉伸应力为4.7(SD 4)MPa和4.2 (SD 3)MPa分别。缝合线切割是最常见的失败模式。结论:我们发现在负载中的2台维修之间没有统计差异,它们开始失败 p = 0.16),并且最大负载维修可以承受 p = 0.35)。我们的研究在标准条件下独特地比较了两种技术,与现有证据相反发现没有差异。然而,在我们看来,锚点的数量可能比强度的编织数量更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号