...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgery: Official Journal of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie, Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, and of the International Association of Endocrine Surgeons >Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity
【24h】

Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity

机译:Extralevator腹部会阴切除与标准腹部会阴切除术:对切除的标本和术后发病率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Abdominal perineal excision (APE) has been associated with a high risk of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+) and local recurrence rates in the treatment of rectal cancer. An alternative extralevator approach (ELAPE) has been suggested to improve the quality of resection by avoiding coning of the specimen decreasing the risk of tumor perforation and CRM+. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of the resected specimen and postoperative complication rates between ELAPE and "standard" APE.
机译:背景技术腹部会阴切除(猿)与阳性周向切除率高(CRM +)和局部复发率治疗直肠癌的局部复发率有关。 已经提出了一种替代的外轨方法(Eleape)以通过避免标本的形成降低肿瘤穿孔和CRM +的风险来改善切除质量。 本研究的目的是比较Eleape和“标准”APE之间切除的样本和术后并发症率的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号