...
首页> 外文期刊>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing >Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation
【24h】

Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation

机译:基于循证实践的爱荷华州模型:修订和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Background The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model. Methods A systematic multi‐step process was used capturing information from the literature and user feedback via an electronic survey and live work groups. The Iowa Model Collaborative critically assessed and synthesized information and recommendations before revising the model. Results Survey participants ( n = 431) had requested access to the Model between years 2001 and 2013. Eighty‐eight percent ( n = 379) of participants reported using the Iowa Model and identified the most problematic steps as: topic priority, critique, pilot, and institute change. Users provided 587 comments with rich contextual rationale and insightful suggestions. The revised model was then evaluated by participants ( n = 299) of the 22nd National EBP Conference in 2015. They validated the model as a practical tool for the EBP process across diverse settings. Specific changes in the model are discussed. Conclusion This user driven revision differs from other frameworks in that it links practice changes within the system. Major model changes are expansion of piloting, implementation, patient engagement, and sustaining change. Linking Evidence to Action The Iowa Model‐Revised remains an application‐oriented guide for the EBP process. Intended users are point of care clinicians who ask questions and seek a systematic, EBP approach to promote excellence in health care.
机译:摘要背景IOWA模型是一个广泛使用的框架,用于实施基于证据的实践(EBP)。医疗保健的变化(例如,实施科学的出现,强调患者参与)促使模型的重新评估,修改和验证。方法通过电子调查和实时工作组使用系统多步骤从文献和用户反馈中捕获信息。在修改模型之前,IOWA模型协作批判性评估和综合信息和建议。结果调查参与者(n = 431)要求访问2001年和2013年之间的模型。使用爱荷华州模型报告的参与者八十八分(n = 379),并确定了最有问题的步骤:主题优先权,批评,飞行员和研究所改变。用户提供587条评论,具有丰富的上下文理由和洞察力建议。然后由2015年第22届全国EBP会议的参与者(N = 299)评估修订的模型。他们将该模型作为跨多样化设置的EBP流程的实用工具验证。讨论了模型的具体变化。结论该用户驱动的修订与其他框架的不同之处在于它链接系统内的实践变化。主要模型的变化是扩大试验,实施,患者参与和维持变化。链接证据才能进行IOWA模型修订的仍然是EBP进程的面向应用程序指南。预期用户是询问问题并寻求系统,EBP方法的护理临床医生,以促进卓越的医疗保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号