首页> 外文期刊>Women & health >A symptom diary to assess severe premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder
【24h】

A symptom diary to assess severe premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder

机译:症状日记评估严重明显综合征和经常疑惑疾病的症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The differentiation between premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) has been widely discussed. PMDD is listed as a mental disorder in the DSM-5, whereas PMS is not considered as a mental disorder in any diagnostic manual. Consequently, PMS is operationalized in different ways. Keeping a symptom diary is required to diagnose PMDD but is also recommended for PMS. The aim of our study was, therefore, to operationalize PMS and PMDD within a DSM-5-based symptom diary. We developed a symptom-intensity-score (SI-score) and an interference-score (INT-score) to evaluate the symptom diary. Ninety-eight women (aged 20-45years) completed a symptom diary over two menstrual cycles, a retrospective screening for premenstrual symptoms, and answered additional impairment questionnaires from August 2013 to August 2015. The scores revealed moderate to good reliability (Cronbach's =0.83-0.96). Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with a retrospective screening, the Pain Disability Index, and the German PMS-Impact Questionnaire. Discriminant validity was indicated by low correlations with the Big Five Inventory-10. These scores may facilitate the evaluation of prospective symptom ratings in research and clinical practice. Future research should focus on continuing to validate the scores (e.g., in an ambulatory setting).
机译:经前期综合征(PMS)和经常疑风障碍(PMDD)之间的分化已被广泛讨论。 PMDD被列为DSM-5中的精神障碍,而PMS在任何诊断手册中都不被视为精神障碍。因此,PMS以不同的方式运行。保持症状日记需要诊断PMDD,但也推荐用于PMS。因此,我们的研究目的是在基于DSM-5的症状日记中运营PMS和PMDD。我们开发了一种症状 - 强度分数(SI-得分)和干扰评分(INT-SCARE),以评估症状日记。九十八名女性(年龄20-45年)完成了两次月经周期的症状日记,重新开始筛查过早症状,并从2013年8月至2015年8月回答了额外的损伤问卷。分数揭示了适度的可靠性(Cronbach的= 0.83- 0.96)。通过与回顾性筛查,止痛性筛查,止痛性指数和德国PMS影响问卷的显着相关性显示会聚有效性。判别有效性与大五个库存-10的低相关表示。这些评分可以促进对研究和临床实践中的前瞻性症状评级的评估。未来的研究应专注于持续验证分数(例如,在漫游环境中)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号