首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Flow diversion versus traditional endovascular coiling therapy: Design of the prospective LARGE aneurysm randomized trial
【24h】

Flow diversion versus traditional endovascular coiling therapy: Design of the prospective LARGE aneurysm randomized trial

机译:血流转移与传统血管内盘绕治疗:前瞻性大动脉瘤随机试验设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of aneurysm treatment is occlusion of an aneurysm without morbidity or mortality. Using well-established, traditional endovascular techniques, this is generally achievable with a high level of safety and efficacy. These techniques involve either constructive treatment of the aneurysm (coils with or without an intravascular stent) or deconstruction (coil occlusion) of the aneurysm and the parent artery. While established as safe and efficacious, the constructive treatment of large and giant aneurysms with coils has typically been associated with relatively lower rates of complete occlusion and higher rates of recurrence. Parent artery deconstruction, though immediately efficacious in achieving complete and durable occlusion, does require occlusion of a major intracranial blood vessel and is associated with risk of stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow diversion represents a new technology that can be used to constructively treat large and giant aneurysms. Once excluded successfully, the vessel reconstruction and aneurysm occlusion appears durable. The ability to definitively reconstruct cerebral blood vessels is an attractive approach to these large and giant complex aneurysms and allows the treatment of some aneurysms which were previously not amenable to other therapies. By comparison, conventional coiling techniques have traditionally been used for endovascular treatment of large aneurysms. Large and giant aneurysms that are amenable to either flow diversion or traditional endovascular treatment will be randomized to either therapy with FDA (or appropriate regulatory body) approved devices. RESULTS: The trial is currently enrolling and results of the data are pending the completion of enrollment and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This paper details the trial design of the LARGE trial, a blinded, prospective randomized trial of large anterior circulation aneurysms amenable to either traditional endovascular treatments using coils or reconstruction with flow diverters.
机译:背景与目的:动脉瘤的治疗目标是闭塞动脉瘤,而无发病率或死亡率。使用成熟的传统血管内技术,通常可以以高水平的安全性和有效性来实现。这些技术包括对动脉瘤(带有或不带有血管内支架的线圈)进行结构性治疗或对动脉瘤和亲代动脉进行解构(线圈阻塞)。虽然被认为是安全有效的,但是用线圈进行的大而巨大的动脉瘤的建设性治疗通常与较低的完全闭塞率和较高的复发率相关。亲本动脉解构尽管可立即有效地实现完全持久的闭塞,但确实需要闭塞大颅内血管并且与中风风险相关。材料与方法:流量转移是一项新技术,可用于建设性地治疗大型和巨型动脉瘤。一旦成功排除血管,血管重建和动脉瘤闭塞似乎是持久的。最终重建脑血管的能力是这些大而复杂的动脉瘤的一种吸引人的方法,可以治疗某些以前不适合其他疗法的动脉瘤。相比之下,传统的盘绕技术传统上已用于大动脉瘤的血管内治疗。适用于分流或传统血管内治疗的大动脉瘤和大动脉瘤将随机分配至采用FDA(或适当监管机构)批准的设备进行的治疗。结果:该试验目前正在入组,数据结果尚待完成入组和随访。结论:本文详细介绍了大型,前循环动脉瘤的盲,前瞻性随机试验LARGE试验的试验设计,该试验适用于采用盘管的传统血管内治疗或采用分流器重建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号