...
首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics
【24h】

Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics

机译:脑动脉瘤血流动力学的计算流体动力学模拟中的广义与患者特定流入边界条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Attempts have been made to associate intracranial aneurysmal hemodynamics with aneurysm growth and rupture status. Hemodynamics in aneurysms is traditionally determined with computational fluid dynamics by using generalized inflow boundary conditions in a parent artery. Recently, patient-specific inflow boundary conditions are being implemented more frequently. Our purpose was to compare intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics based on generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 36 patients, geometric models of aneurysms were determined by using 3D rotational angiography. 2D phase-contrast MR imaging velocity measurements of the parent artery were performed. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed twice: once by using patient-specific phase-contrast MR imaging velocity profiles and once by using generalized Womersley profiles as inflow boundary conditions. Resulting mean and maximum wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index values were analyzed, and hemodynamic characteristics were qualitatively compared. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis showed statistically significant differences for mean and maximum wall shear stress values between both inflow boundary conditions (P < .001). Qualitative assessment of hemodynamic characteristics showed differences in 21 cases: high wall shear stress location (n = 8), deflection location (n = 3), lobulation wall shear stress (n = 12), and/or vortex and inflow jet stability (n = 9). The latter showed more instability for the generalized inflow boundary conditions in 7 of 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using generalized and patient-specific inflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics results in different wall shear stress magnitudes and hemodynamic characteristics. Generalized inflow boundary conditions result in more vortices and inflow jet instabilities. This study emphasizes the necessity of patient-specific inflow boundary conditions for calculation of hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms by using computational fluid dynamics techniques.
机译:背景与目的:已尝试将颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学与动脉瘤的生长和破裂状态联系起来。传统上,动脉瘤的血流动力学是通过计算流体动力学来确定的,方法是使用母动脉中的广义流入边界条件。最近,特定于患者的流入边界条件被更频繁地实施。我们的目的是根据广义与患者特定的流入边界条件比较颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学。材料与方法:对于36例患者,使用3D旋转血管造影术确定了动脉瘤的几何模型。进行了母动脉的二维相差MR成像速度测量。计算流体动力学模拟进行了两次:一次通过使用患者特定的相衬MR成像速度曲线,一次通过使用广义的Womersley曲线作为流入边界条件。分析所得的平均和最大壁面剪切应力以及振荡剪切指数值,并定性比较血液动力学特征。结果:定量分析显示两种流入边界条件之间的平均和最大壁面剪应力值在统计学上有显着差异(P <.001)。血液动力学特征的定性评估显示21例存在差异:高壁切应力位置(n = 8),挠曲位置(n = 3),叶状壁切应力(n = 12)和/或涡流和流入射流稳定性(n = 9)。后者在9例患者中有7例针对广义入流边界条件显示出更多的不稳定性。结论:使用广义的和特定于患者的流入边界条件进行计算流体动力学会导致不同的壁切应力大小和血液动力学特征。广义的流入边界条件导致更多的涡旋和流入射流的不稳定性。这项研究强调了使用计算流体动力学技术来计算脑动脉瘤血流动力学的患者特定流入边界条件的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号