首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Symptom differences and pretreatment asymptomatic interval affect outcomes of stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic disease
【24h】

Symptom differences and pretreatment asymptomatic interval affect outcomes of stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic disease

机译:症状差异和治疗前无症状间隔影响颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病支架置入的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different types of symptomatic intracranial stenosis may respond differently to interventional therapy. We investigated symptomatic and pathophysiologic factors that may influence clinical outcomes of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease who were treated with stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients treated with stents for intracranial atherosclerosis at 4 centers. Patient demographics and comorbidities, lesion features, treatment features, and preprocedural and postprocedural functional status were noted. χ2 univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess technical results and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two lesions in 131 patients were analyzed. Lesions causing hypoperfusion ischemic symptoms were associated with fewer strokes by last contact [χ2 (1, n = 63) = 5.41, P = .019]. Nonhypoperfusion lesions causing symptoms during the 14 days before treatment had more strokes by last contact [χ2 (1, n = 136), 4.21, P = .047]. Patients treated with stents designed for intracranial deployment were more likely to have had a stroke by last contact (OR, 4.63; P = .032), and patients treated with percutaneous balloon angioplasty in addition to deployment of a self-expanding stent were less likely to be stroke free at point of last contact (OR, 0.60; P = .034). CONCLUSIONS: More favorable outcomes may occur after stent placement for lesions causing hypoperfusion symptoms and when delaying stent placement 7-14 days after most recent symptoms for lesions suspected to cause embolic disease or perforator ischemia. Angioplasty performed in addition to self-expanding stent deployment may lead to worse outcomes, as may use of self-expanding stents rather than balloon-mounted stents.
机译:背景与目的:不同类型的症状性颅内狭窄对介入治疗的反应可能不同。我们调查了症状和病理生理因素,这些因素可能会影响接受支架治疗的颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病患者的临床结局。材料与方法:对4个中心颅内动脉粥样硬化支架治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。记录了患者的人口统计学特征和合并症,病变特征,治疗特征以及术前和术后功能状态。进行χ2单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以评估技术结果和临床结果。结果:对131例患者的142个病灶进行了分析。通过最后一次接触,引起灌注不足缺血症状的病变与较少的卒中相关[χ2(1,n = 63)= 5.41,P = .019]。在治疗前14天内引起症状的非灌注不足病变在最后一次接触时发生了更多中风[χ2(1,n = 136),4.21,P = .047]。使用设计为颅内部署的支架治疗的患者更有可能在最后一次接触时发生中风(OR,4.63; P = .032),并且除了部署了自扩张支架之外,还进行了经皮球囊血管成形术治疗的患者在最后一次接触点无行程(OR,0.60; P = .034)。结论:对于可能引起栓塞性疾病或穿孔性缺血的病变,在支架置入后引起低灌注症状的病变和延迟支架置入后7-14天,可能会出现更有利的结果。除了使用自扩张式支架而不是气囊安装式支架以外,进行血管成形术还可能导致较差的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号