首页> 外文期刊>Air medical journal >Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for interfacility transfers in a regional referral system.
【24h】

Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for interfacility transfers in a regional referral system.

机译:航空运输更快吗?比较区域转诊系统中设施间转移的空中运输时间与地面运输时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Helicopter transport is often considered in an effort to minimize time to critical interventions, such as cardiac catheterization or arterial thrombolysis in stroke patients. However, for interfacility transports, the extra time considerations for helicopter preparation, takeoff, and time to get to the transferring hospital may not offset the slower transport times for local ground ambulances. The purpose of this study was to compare transport times for helicopter with traditional ground ambulance for interfacility transfers within a regional referral system. METHODS: All patients transported from an outside hospital to the intensive care unit of the University of Wisconsin were eligible for this study. Equal numbers of patients transferred by ground and by helicopter from each facility were sequentially selected. The following intervals were compared: time from call to dispatch, time from dispatch to arrival at the referring hospital, time at the referring hospital, transport time to thereceiving hospital, and total transport time. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were included in this study, transferred from 20 hospitals within the UW referral system. Dispatch times and time at the referring hospital were location independent, and each was shorter for ground transport. Ground dispatch times were 5+/-6 minutes, whereas for helicopter transport dispatch times were 17+/-8 (P<.001). Times at the referral hospital were on average longer for helicopter transport (31+/-11 minutes for air ambulance, 25+/-13 for ground; P=.008). Other intervals were location dependent. Arrivals were much more variable for ground transport, reflecting the fact that private ambulance services may have to travel some distance to reach the referring hospital (helicopter 18+/-8 minutes, ground 19+/-18 minutes). As expected, transport time from the referring hospital was shorter for helicopter transport. From each of the hospitals, average helicopter transport was as fast as the best ground transport. CONCLUSION: Helicopter transport was faster than ground transport for interfacility transfer of patients from all hospitals studied in our referral system. Under optimal dispatch and transport conditions, the time difference from several hospitals was minimal. For stable patients for whom the only issue is time to critical procedure, it may be reasonable for those hospitals to try ground transport first if timely service is available to transport in that way. Even for those hospitals, helicopter transport should be considered for these patients if ground transport is not optimally available, as well as for patients in whom minimizing time outside of the hospital is a significant consideration, or when transport of such patients impacts emergency medical services availability to the community for a significant time.
机译:简介:通常考虑使用直升机运输,以尽量减少进行关键干预措施的时间,例如中风患者的心脏导管插入术或动脉溶栓治疗。但是,对于跨设施运输,直升机准备,起飞和到达转送医院的时间的额外时间考虑可能无法抵消当地地面救护车运输时间的缩短。本研究的目的是比较直升机与传统地面救护车在区域转诊系统中进行设施间转移的运输时间。方法:所有从外部医院转移至威斯康星大学重症监护室的患者均符合此项研究的条件。依次选择了从每个设施通过地面和直升机转移的相等数量的患者。比较以下时间间隔:从呼叫到派遣的时间,从派遣到到达推荐医院的时间,在推荐医院的时间,到接收医院的运输时间以及总运输时间。结果:这项研究纳入了145名患者,这些患者是从UW转诊系统中的20家医院转移而来的。派遣时间和在转诊医院的时间是独立于位置的,地面运输的时间和时间都较短。地面调度时间是5 +/- 6分钟,而直升机运输调度时间是17 +/- 8(P <.001)。转诊医院的直升机运输时间平均更长(空中救护车为31 +/- 11分钟,地面为25 +/- 13分钟; P = .008)。其他间隔与位置有关。地面运输的到达情况变化更大,这反映了以下事实:私人救护车服务可能必须走一段距离才能到达转诊医院(直升机18 +/- 8分钟,地面19 +/- 18分钟)。不出所料,直升飞机从转诊医院的运输时间缩短了。从每家医院来看,直升机的平均运输速度与最佳地面运输速度一样快。结论:在我们的转诊系统中,所有医院的患者之间的设施间转移都比地面运输快。在最佳的调度和运输条件下,几家医院的时间差很小。对于唯一需要紧急治疗的稳定患者,如果能够以这种方式提供及时的服务,那么对于那些医院来说,首先尝试地面运输是合理的。即使对于那些医院,如果不能以最佳方式进行地面运输,也应该考虑对这些患者进行直升机运输;对于那些考虑在医院外尽量减少时间,或者此类患者的运输影响紧急医疗服务可用性的患者,也应考虑使用直升机运输在相当长的一段时间内进入社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号