【24h】

64-MDCT angiography of the coronary arteries: nationwide survey of patient preparation practice.

机译:冠状动脉的64-MDCT血管造影:患者准备工作的全国性调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current practice of patient preparation for 64-MDCT angiography (CTA) of the coronary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sites in the United States that perform 64-MDCT coronary angiography were surveyed by mail in 2006. Information requested included physician specialty; experience level; details about patient preparation, including the use, dose, route, and timing of premedication; and acceptable heart rate and rhythm. A total of 142 surveys were analyzed, with comparison of parameters across specialties (radiology, cardiology, or shared) and experience levels. RESULTS: All facets of the study (premedication, data acquisition, cardiac interpretation) are performed exclusively by radiologists in 49% of sites and by cardiologists in 14%. All sites administer beta-blockers. Target heart rate was reported as < or = 65 beats per minute (bpm) by 89% of responders. Despite most centers aiming for a heart rate of < or = 65 bpm, the maximum allowable heart rate is > 65 bpm in 80% of centers. Patients with arrhythmia are scanned in at least 25% of sites. Most sites (84%) administer nitroglycerin. Significant differences between specialties were noted for experience levels, timing and route of beta-blocker administration, and for target heart rate. The likelihood of scanning in the setting of arrhythmia and beta-blocker timing correlated with experience levels. CONCLUSION: These 64-MDCT coronary artery data from 2006 reveal consensus for a range of patient preparation parameters. Use of beta-blockers and nitroglycerin is routine, and the target heart rate is usually < or = 65 bpm. However, differences were noted for beta-blocker protocols and acceptable heart rate and rhythm, and some differences in practice are associated with experience level and specialty.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估目前准备进行冠状动脉64-MDCT血管造影(CTA)的患者的做法。材料与方法:2006年通过邮件调查了在美国进行64-MDCT冠状动脉造影的站点。经验水平;有关患者准备的详细信息,包括用药的剂量,剂量,途径和时机;以及可接受的心律和心律。总共分析了142个调查,并比较了各个专业(放射线,心脏病或共享)和经验水平的参数。结果:研究的所有方面(预防,数据采集,心脏解释)仅由49%的放射科医生和14%的心脏病专家进行。所有站点都管理β受体阻滞剂。 89%的响应者报告目标心率小于或等于65次/分钟(bpm)。尽管大多数中心的目标心率均小于或等于65 bpm,但在80%的中心中,最大允许心率均大于65 bpm。在至少25%的位置扫描心律不齐的患者。大多数部位(84%)使用硝酸甘油。注意到专业水平之间的显着差异,包括经验水平,β-受体阻滞剂给药的时机和途径以及目标心率。心律失常和β受体阻滞剂定时扫描的可能性与经验水平相关。结论:2006年的这些64-MDCT冠状动脉数据揭示了一系列患者准备参数的共识。通常使用β受体阻滞剂和硝酸甘油,目标心率通常≤65 bpm。但是,注意到了β受体阻滞剂方案和可接受的心律和心律方面的差异,实践中的某些差异与经验水平和专长有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号