首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Auricular Prostheses Produced by Means of Conventional and Digital Workflows: A Clinical Report on Esthetic Outcomes
【24h】

Auricular Prostheses Produced by Means of Conventional and Digital Workflows: A Clinical Report on Esthetic Outcomes

机译:通过常规和数字工作流程产生的耳廓假体:关于美学结果的临床报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The utilization of additive manufacturing (AM) technology for the production of auricular prostheses has been widely acknowledged. However, few studies and case history reports have evaluated the esthetic outcomes of AM prostheses compared to those of conventionally manufactured prostheses. In this case history report, three manufacturing approaches-conventional, indirect, and direct mold preparation-were assessed for their esthetic outcomes in the same patient.
机译:广泛承认,利用添加剂制造(AM)技术为生产耳廓假体的生产。 然而,与常规制造的假体相比,很少有研究和案例历史报告评估了AM假体的美学结果。 在这种情况下,在同一患者中评估了三种制造方法 - 常规,间接和直接模具制剂 - 在同一患者中进行美学结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号