首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Practical strategies and perceptions from community pharmacists following their experiences with conducting pharmacy practice research: a qualitative content analysis
【24h】

Practical strategies and perceptions from community pharmacists following their experiences with conducting pharmacy practice research: a qualitative content analysis

机译:社区药剂师在进行药房实践研究中的实际策略和看法:定性内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives While prior research identified barriers to conducting research in community pharmacies, there remains a need to better understand facilitators to ensure successful collaborations between academic researchers and pharmacists. Our objective was to determine the experiences and perspectives of community pharmacists who have recently conducted a pharmacy practice‐based research study to gain in‐depth understanding of challenges as well as facilitators and identify strategies and solutions. Methods We conducted a qualitative study involving one‐on‐one semi‐structured telephone interviews with community pharmacists following the completion of a practice‐based research study in their pharmacies. Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive content analysis involving open coding, creating categories and abstraction into final themes. Key findings Eleven pharmacists participated in the qualitative interviews. We identified six major themes including: (1) barriers (e.g. time constraints); (2) facilitators (e.g. ideal pharmacy layout); (3) support and resources from academic researchers (e.g. helpfulness of training, easy‐to‐use study materials); (4) pharmacist‐initiated strategies for conducting research (beyond prior suggestions from researchers); (5) suggestions for future pharmacy practice research; and (6) motivation for conducting pharmacy practice research. These findings informed practical strategies targeted at academic researchers and pharmacists, respectively, to facilitate the conduct of research in community pharmacists across various stages of the research process. Conclusions Our study adds to better understanding of community pharmacists' perspectives on conducting research and identifies practical solutions that can be readily implemented by academic researchers and pharmacists participating in research.
机译:摘要目标虽然先前研究确定了在社区药房进行研究的障碍,但仍然需要更好地了解协调人,以确保学术研究人员和药剂师之间的成功合作。我们的目标是确定最近进行了基于药房实践的研究研究的社区药剂师的经验和观点,以深入了解对挑战以及促进者并确定战略和解决方案。方法采用一项定性研究,涉及一对一的半结构化电话访谈,在完成其药房的实践研究研究之后,与社区药剂师进行一对一的半结构化电话。使用涉及开放编码,创建类别和抽象的归纳内容分析来分析面试成绩单。主要调查结果十一药剂师参加了定性访谈。我们确定了六个主要主题,包括:(1)障碍(例如时间限制); (2)促进者(例如理想药房布局); (3)来自学术研究人员的支持和资源(例如,培训乐观,易于使用的学习材料); (4)药剂师发起的开展研究策略(超出研究人员的现有建议); (5)未来药房实践研究的建议; (6)进行药房实践研究的动机。这些调查结果分别提供了学术研究人员和药剂师的实际策略,促进在研究过程的各个阶段进行社区药剂师的研究。结论我们的研究增加了更好地了解社区药剂师对进行研究的看法,并确定了参加研究的学术研究人员和药剂师可以容易地实施的实用解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号