...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systems is Review
【24h】

Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systems is Review

机译:在后颌骨植入物:开放的鼻窦升力与常规植入物放置。 系统是审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To compare implant survival, marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, and complications in dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla in native bone or after grafting using the open sinus lift technique. Materials and Methods: A search was made of two electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register [CENTRAL]), complemented by a manual search. The study included randomized clinical trials, non-randomized clinical trials, and observational studies such as cohort studies and case-control studies conducted on a prospective or retrospective basis and comparing the placement of standard-length implants (>= 10 mm) in native bone or after grafting using the sinus lift procedure. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Results: The search yielded 51 studies, of which 23 were included. Two studies were evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, with neither being identified as presenting a low risk of bias. Twenty-one studies were evaluated by the MINORS, yielding a mean score of 15.76 points out of 24. The implant survival rate in the control group was 90% to 100% versus 75.3% to 100% in the test group over a follow-up period of 6 to 120 months. Most studies revealed no statistically significant differences. In most of the publications, marginal bone loss was greater in the test group than in the control group, though without reaching statistical significance. Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the peri-implant clinical parameters. There were more surgical complications in the test group than in the control group-such complications being inherent to the sinus lift procedure. Conclusion: Implant placement after sinus lift affords results in terms of implant survival, marginal bone loss, and ped-implant clinical parameters similar to those obtained with conventional implant placement in native bone. However, there is a greater incidence of surgical complications associated with the sinus lift procedure.
机译:目的:比较植入物存活,边缘骨质损失,临床临床参数,牙科植入物中的并发症置于原生骨后颌骨上,或使用开放的窦提升技术接枝后。材料和方法:搜索由两个电子数据库(Medline通过Pubmed和Cochrane口头健康组试验[Central]),由手动搜索补充。该研究包括随机化的临床试验,非随机化临床试验和观察研究,例如在预期或回顾性的基础上进行的队列研究和病例对照研究,并比较原生骨中的标准长度植入物(> = 10mm)的放置或使用窦提升程序接枝后。通过偏见评估工具的Cochrane风险和非随机研究(未成年人)的方法指标评估偏差风险。结果:搜索产生了51项研究,其中包括23项。通过偏见评估工具的Cochrane风险评估了两项研究,既没有被确定为呈现低偏倚风险。未成年人评估了二十一项研究,产生平均得分为15.76分。对照组的植入物存活率在后续后试验组中的75.3%至100%。期间为6至120个月。大多数研究显示没有统计学上的差异。在大多数出版物中,测试组中的边际骨质损失大于对照组,但不达到统计学意义。关于PERI植入临床参数的两组中获得了类似的结果。试验组中的手术并发症比对照组更多的手术并发症 - 这些并发症是鼻窦升降程序所固有的。结论:鼻升升力后的植入物放置在植入物存活,边际骨质损失和具有常规植入物中获得的植入物临床参数的临床临床参数。然而,与窦提升程序相关的手术并发症的发生率更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号