首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:筛查CT结肠造影时发现的小(6至9毫米)息肉的临床管理:成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this model analysis was to compare the clinical and economic impacts of immediate polypectomy versus 3-year CT colonography (CTC) surveillance for small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at CTC screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed incorporating the expected advanced neoplasia prevalence, frequency of measurable growth, colorectal cancer (CRC) prevalence and risk, CTC performance, and costs related to CRC screening and treatment. CRC risk was assumed to be independent of advanced adenoma size, which intentionally overestimates the risk related to small polyps. Clinical effectiveness and costs for 3-year CTC surveillance versus immediate colonoscopic polypectomy were compared for a concentrated cohort of patients with 6- to 9-mm polyps. For the CTC surveillance strategy, only cases with measurable growth (> or = 1 mm) at follow-up CTC were referred for polypectomy. RESULTS: Without any intervention, the estimated 5-year CRC death rate from 6- to 9-mm polyps in this concentrated cohort was 0.08%, which is a sevenfold decrease over the 0.56% CRC risk for the general unselected screening population. The death rate was further reduced to 0.03% with the CTC surveillance strategy and to 0.02% with immediate colonoscopy referral. However, for each additional cancer-related death prevented with immediate polypectomy versus CTC follow-up, 9,977 colonoscopy referrals would be needed, resulting in 10 additional perforations and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Dollars 372,853. CONCLUSION: For patients with small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at CTC screening, the exclusion of large polyps (> or = 10 mm) already confers a very low risk of CRC. The high costs, additional complications, and relatively low incremental yield associated with immediate polypectomy of 6- to 9-mm polyps support the practice of 3-year CTC surveillance, which allows for selective noninvasive identification of small polyps at risk.
机译:目的:该模型分析的主要目的是比较即时息肉切除术与3年CT结肠造影(CTC)监视对在CTC筛查中发现的小(6至9毫米)息肉的临床和经济影响。材料与方法:构建了一个决策分析模型,该模型包含了预期的晚期赘生物流行率,可测量的生长频率,结直肠癌(CRC)患病率和风险,CTC表现以及与CRC筛查和治疗相关的费用。 CRC风险被认为与晚期腺瘤大小无关,这有意高估了与小息肉有关的风险。比较了集中人群中6至9毫米息肉患者的3年CTC监测与即时结肠镜息肉切除术的临床效果和成本。对于CTC监测策略,仅将在随访CTC时可测量的生长(>或= 1 mm)的病例转诊为息肉切除术。结果:在没有任何干预的情况下,在这个集中的人群中,从6mm到9mm息肉的5年CRC死亡率估计为0.08%,比一般未筛选人群的0.56%CRC风险降低了7倍。通过CTC监测策略,死亡率进一步降低到0.03%,通过立即结肠镜检查转诊,死亡率进一步降低到0.02%。但是,对于立即通过息肉切除术而不是CTC随访预防的癌症相关的死亡,将需要转诊9,977例结肠镜检查,这将导致另外10例穿孔,并增加成本效益比372,853美元。结论:对于在CTC筛查中发现息肉较小(6至9毫米)的患者,排除大息肉(>或= 10毫米)已经具有非常低的CRC风险。立即进行6至9毫米息肉息肉切除术的高成本,附加并发症和相对较低的增产支持了3年CTC监测的实践,这使得可以选择性无创地鉴定有风险的小息肉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号