首页> 外文期刊>AJOB neuroscience >Review of Sean A. Spence, The Actors Brain: Exploring the Cognitive Neuroscience of Free Will~1
【24h】

Review of Sean A. Spence, The Actors Brain: Exploring the Cognitive Neuroscience of Free Will~1

机译:肖恩·A·斯潘斯(Sean A. Spence)的评论,演员大脑:探索自由意志的认知神经科学〜1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditional philosophical accounts of free will have attempted to explain how human agents can choose and act freely in spite of divine foreknowledge and causal determinism, the thesis that natural laws and past events jointly determine a unique future. Neuroscientific findings in the last 30 years have shifted the focus of the debate on free will from these external factors to the internal relation of our brains to our minds. They have questioned whether unconscious mechanistic or deterministic processes in the brain can provide a complete explanation of human behavior without any appeal to the conscious mental states we associate with free will. In The Actor's Brain: Exploring the Cognitive Neuroscience of Free Will, psychiatrist Sean Spence perceptively analyzes and discusses this question by explaining the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological underpinning of human behavior, as well as how the brain interacts with environmental, genetic, and psychological factors in shaping the capacity to choose and act. Defining free will as volition, or unimpeded human action, Spence's general position is that these factors constrain the will to varying degrees: "The human capacity for volition, for voluntary control, or the apparent expression of 'willed' actions, is subject to multiple constraints" (363). He adds: "If the human agent possesses any 'freedom' at all, then it is a freedom that is expressed under certain 'optimal' conditions, be they structural, neurochemical, interpersonal, or situational. Phenomenologically, we certainly give the impression of being free, some of the time, but there are a great many circumstances that may serve to deprive us of such freedom" (378).
机译:传统的关于自由的哲学解释将试图解释人类的主体如何在神的预知和因果决定论下自由选择和行动,即自然法则和过去的事件共同决定了一个独特的未来。在过去30年中,神经科学方面的发现已将关于自由意志的辩论的重点从这些外部因素转移到了大脑与大脑的内部关系上。他们质疑大脑的无意识机械过程或确定性过程是否可以提供人类行为的完整解释,而对我们与自由意志相关的有意识的心理状态没有任何吸引力。在《演员的大脑:探索自由意志的认知神经科学》中,精神病学家肖恩·斯彭斯通过解释人类行为的神经解剖学和神经生理学基础,以及大脑如何与塑造过程中的环境,遗传和心理因素相互作用,来敏锐地分析和讨论这个问题。选择和行动的能力。 Spence将自由意志定义为意志或不受阻碍的人类行动,其总体立场是这些因素在不同程度上限制了意志:“人类的意志,自愿控制能力或“意志”行动的表象表达受到多种因素的约束。约束”(363)。他补充说:“如果人类行为者完全拥有任何'自由',那么它是在某些'最佳'条件下表达的自由,无论是结构,神经化学,人际关系还是情境。在现象学上,我们肯定给人以在某些时候是自由的,但在许多情况下可能会剥夺我们这种自由”(378)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号