...
首页> 外文期刊>Vascular and endovascular surgery >Early Cannulation of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Reduces Tunneled Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications: A Comparison of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Versus Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts in Hemodialysis Access
【24h】

Early Cannulation of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Reduces Tunneled Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications: A Comparison of Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Versus Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts in Hemodialysis Access

机译:牛颈动脉移植的早期插管减少了隧道透析导管相关的并发症:牛颈动脉移植物与血液透析通道中的膨胀聚四氟乙烯移植物的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: In patients who receive chronic hemodialysis but do not have autogenous venous conduit for a native dialysis access, nonautologous grafts serve as an alternative conduit of choice. This study compared the clinical outcome of hemodialysis access using bovine carotid artery graft (BCAG) and prosthetic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft in patients who receive chronic hemodialysis. Methods: An analysis of all patients undergoing hemodialysis using either BCAG or PTFE grafts from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed including graft patency as well as associated complications related to dialysis grafts and tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). Results: During the study period, 142 patients received BCAG and 128 patients received PTFE graft implantation for dialysis access. The mean duration from graft implantation to graft cannulation in the BCAG and PTFE group was 12.3 +/- 8.5 days versus 43.5 +/- 16.4, respectively (P = .01). Bovine carotid artery graft group had a higher 2-year primary patency rate (33% vs 14%, P = .03) and assisted primary rate (57% vs 23%, P = .02) compared to the PTFE group. The 2-year secondary patency rates were similar between the 2 groups (56% vs 53%, P = .69). Complication rates in the BCAG and PTFE group was 1.69 +/- 0.24 per patient-year versus 2.54 +/- 0.48 per patient-year, respectively (P = .01). Tunneled dialysis catheter-related infection was greater in the PTFE group compared to the BCAG group (10.87 +/- 2.61 vs 5.69 +/- 0.98 per 1000 TDC days; P = .02). Bovine carotid artery graft cohorts group required a mean of 1.69 interventions per patient-year, compared to 2.76 per patient-year for the PTFE group (P = .03). Conclusions: Bovine carotid artery graft permits earlier cannulation for hemodialysis access with superior primary and assisted primary patency rates compared to PTFE grafts. Patients with BCAG experienced shorter indwelling TDC duration and less TDC-related complications compared to PTFE cohorts.
机译:介绍:在接受慢性血液透析但没有自动透析的静脉导管的患者中,非转移术用作选择的替代导管。本研究将血液透析动脉移植(BCAG)和接受慢性血液透析性患者的假体聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)移植物进行了血液透析通路的临床结果。方法:从2010年至2017年开始,对使用BCAG或PTFE移植物进行血液透析患者的分析。分析临床结果,包括接枝通畅以及与透析移植物相关的相关并发症和隧道透析导管(TDC)。结果:在研究期间,142名患者接受BCAG和128名患者接受PTFE移植物植入透析接入。从移植物注入到BCAG和PTFE组接枝套管的平均持续时间分别为12.3 +/- 8.5天,分别与43.5 +/- 16.4分别(p = .01)。与PTFE组相比,牛颈动脉移植组具有更高的2年初级通率(33%vs14%,P = .03),辅助初级速率(57%vs 23%,p = .02)。 2年的二次二级通用率在2组之间相似(56%Vs 53%,P = .69)。 BCAG和PTFE集团的并发症率分别为每患者年份为1.69 +/- 0.24,分别为2.54 +/- 0.48(P = .01)。与BCAG组相比,PTFE组中隧道透析导管相关感染更大(10.87 +/- 2.61 VS 5.69 +/- 0.98,每1000 TDC天; P = .02)。牛颈动脉移植群落组需要每位患者的每年患者的平均值1.69,而PTFE组的每位患者每年2.76次(P = .03)。结论:与PTFE移植相比,牛颈动脉移植允许早期的血液透析进入具有优异的初级和辅助初级通用率。与PTFE队列相比,BCAG患者患有更短的留置TDC持续时间和较少的TDC相关的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号