首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]
【24h】

Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]

机译:定义卫生保健价值的元素 - 一种健康经济学方法:ISPOR特殊工作组报告[3]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The third section of our Special Task Force report identifies and defines a series of elements that warrant consideration in value assessments of medical technologies. We aim to broaden the view of what constitutes value in health care and to spur new research on incorporating additional elements of value into cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Twelve potential elements of value are considered. Four of them quality-adjusted life-years, net costs, productivity, and adherence-improving factors are conventionally included or considered in value assessments. Eight others, which would be more novel in economic assessments, are defined and discussed: reduction in uncertainty, fear of contagion, insurance value, severity of disease, value of hope, real option value, equity, and scientific spillovers. Most of these are theoretically well understood and available for inclusion in value assessments. The two exceptions are equity and scientific spillover effects, which require more theoretical development and consensus. A number of regulatory authorities around the globe have shown interest in some of these novel elements. Augmenting CEA to consider these additional elements would result in a more comprehensive CEA in line with the "impact inventory" of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Possible approaches for valuation and inclusion of these elements include integrating them as part of a net monetary benefit calculation, including elements as attributes in health state descriptions, or using them as criteria in a multicriteria decision analysis. Further research is needed on how best to measure and include them in decision making.
机译:我们的特殊工作队报告的第三部分确定并确定了一系列认证在医疗技术的价值评估中的要考虑的要素。我们的目标是扩大对医疗保健有价值的看法,并促使将其他价值要素纳入成本效益分析(CEA)的新研究。考虑了十二个潜在的价值元素。其中四个质量调整的寿命,净成本,生产力和依从性改善因素是通常包括或考虑在价值评估中。八个其他人在经济评估中更加新颖,被定义和讨论:减少不确定性,恐惧蔓延,保险价值,疾病严重程度,希望的价值,真实的期权价值,股权和科学溢出。大多数这些都是理论上很好地理解和可用于包含在价值评估中。这两个例外是股权和科学溢出效应,需要更多的理论发展和共识。全球各地的一些监管机构对其中一些新颖的元素表现出兴趣。增强CEA考虑这些额外的要素将导致更全面的CEA与第二小组健康和医学成本效益的“影响库存”。估值和纳入这些要素的可能方法包括将它们作为净货币福利计算的一部分集成,包括作为健康状态描述中的属性的元素,或者将它们作为多标语决策分析中的标准。需要进一步研究如何最好地衡量并在决策中包含它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号