...
首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Clinical implications of internal carotid artery flow impairment caused by filter occlusion during carotid artery stenting
【24h】

Clinical implications of internal carotid artery flow impairment caused by filter occlusion during carotid artery stenting

机译:颈动脉支架置入术中滤网阻塞导致颈内动脉血流障碍的临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Membrane filters are EPDs, which preserve ICA flow during CAS. However, ICA flow arrest may occur with filter use. This report describes the angiographic, clinical, and histopathologic features of the filter occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients with cervical carotid stenosis treated by CAS by using a single type of filter device were evaluated. All patients were on dual antiplatelet treatment and fully heparinized. Prestent dilation was performed in all patients. Poststent dilation was performed in 15 patients. Control angiograms were obtained and evaluated after each step of the CAS procedure. All filters were inspected for debris, and if present, histology was obtained. RESULTS: CAS was successfully performed in all cases with <20% residual stenosis. Filter occlusion occurred in 6 patients (9.8%). It developed immediately after stent deployment in 4, and after a second prestent dilation in 2. Five of the 6 had severe carotid stenosis. In all patients, filter withdrawal led to immediate and complete restoration of ICA flow. In 1 patient, acute embolic M1 occlusion occurred immediately after filter withdrawal but was successfully treated with thrombolysis. None of filter-occlusion group had permanent neurologic deficits. Gross and microscopic examinations demonstrated that the pores of the filters were occluded mainly by fibrin. Postoperative diffusion MR imaging revealed no difference between filter-occlusion and non-filter-occlusion groups. CONCLUSIONS: ICA flow arrest due to filter occlusion during CAS is relatively common and occurs more frequently in severe stenosis. It resolves rapidly after filter removal and does not appear to worsen outcome.
机译:背景与目的:膜过滤器是EPD,可在CAS期间保持ICA流量。但是,使用过滤器时可能会发生ICA流量中断。该报告描述了滤器阻塞的血管造影,临床和组织病理学特征。材料与方法:评估了连续61例接受CAS治疗的颈动脉狭窄患者,采用单一类型的过滤器。所有患者均接受双重抗血小板治疗并完全肝素化。所有患者均行假体扩张术。 15例患者进行了支架扩张术。在CAS程序的每个步骤之后获得对照血管造影照片并进行评估。检查所有过滤器的碎片,如果存在,则获得组织学。结果:所有残余狭窄小于20%的病例均成功进行了CAS。 6例患者发生滤清器阻塞(9.8%)。在4个支架展开后立即发展,在2个支架第二次扩张后发展。6个中有5个严重颈动脉狭窄。在所有患者中,过滤器撤回可立即完全恢复ICA流量。 1例患者,滤器停药后立即发生急性栓塞性M1阻塞,但已成功溶栓治疗。滤器阻塞组均无永久性神经功能缺损。肉眼和显微镜检查表明,过滤器的孔主要被血纤蛋白阻塞。术后弥散MR成像显示过滤器阻塞组和非过滤器阻塞组之间没有差异。结论:CAS期间因滤器阻塞而引起的ICA流量阻滞相对较普遍,在严重狭窄时更常见。去除过滤器后,它会迅速分解,并且不会使结果恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号