...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplant infectious disease: an official journal of the Transplantation Society >Comparison of outcomes with vancomycin or metronidazole for mild‐to‐moderate Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea among solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of outcomes with vancomycin or metronidazole for mild‐to‐moderate Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea among solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study

机译:Vancomycin或甲硝唑的结果比较,用于温和至中等的蛋白质腹菌梭菌腹菌梭菌相关腹泻:一种回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Current guidelines recommend oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea ( CDAD ), while metronidazole is recommended as an alternative when oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin are unavailable. However, data are lacking among the solid organ transplant ( SOT ) population. Methods This single center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult SOT recipients with mild‐to‐moderate CDAD . Analysis 1 evaluated patients receiving initial therapy with metronidazole vs oral vancomycin for at least 72?hours. Analysis 2 evaluated patients receiving metronidazole vs oral vancomycin for at least 70% of the treatment duration. The primary outcome was treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included CDAD recurrence and all‐cause mortality. Results Analysis 1 included 71 patients (metronidazole n?=?50, oral vancomycin n?=?21) and analysis 2 included 75 patients (metronidazole n?=?42, oral vancomycin n?=?33). No significant differences in C.?difficile risk factors were observed between groups in either analysis. However, in both analyses, more patients in the oral vancomycin arm received antibiotics during the CDAD episode (analysis 1, 52% vs 26%, P ?=?.03; analysis 2, 55% vs 32%, P ??.01). Neither analysis demonstrated differences in treatment failure (analysis 1, metronidazole 16%, oral vancomycin 10%, P ?=?.71; analysis 2, metronidazole 2%, oral vancomycin 6%, P ?=?.58). CDAD recurrence and all‐cause mortality were similar across groups in both analyses. Conclusions Results suggest that both metronidazole and oral vancomycin are reasonable options for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate CDAD in patients with SOT . No difference in treatment failure was observed; however, oral vancomycin may be preferred for higher risk patients, such as those receiving concurrent antibiotics.
机译:摘要背景技术推荐口服万古霉素或Fidaxomicin用于治疗轻度至中度的梭菌腹菌相关腹泻(CDAD),而甲硝唑推荐作为口服万古霉素和Fidaxomicin无法使用的替代方案。然而,固体器官移植(SOT)群体中缺乏数据。方法本单中心,回顾性队列研究评估了具有轻度至中等CDAD的成人SOT受体。分析1评估患者接受甲硝唑的初始治疗患者对口服万古霉素至少72小时。分析2评估接受甲硝唑与口服万古霉素的患者至少70%的治疗持续时间。主要结果是治疗失败。二次结果包括CDAD复发和全导致死亡率。结果分析1包括71名患者(甲硝唑N?= 50,口服万古霉素N?=β21)和分析2包括75名患者(甲硝唑N?42,口服万古霉素N?=?33)。在两种分析中,在组之间观察到C.?difficile危险因素没有显着差异。然而,在两种分析中,在CDAD发作期间,口腔万古霉素臂中的更多患者接受抗生素(分析1,52%Vs 26%,P?= 03;分析2,55%Vs 32%,P?< .01)。既不分析都证明了治疗失败的差异(分析1,甲硝唑16%,口服万古霉素10%,p?=〜71;分析2,甲硝唑2%,口服万古霉素6%,p?= 58)。在两种分析中,CDAD复发和全因死亡率相似。结论结果表明,甲硝唑和口服万古霉素都是治疗SOT患者轻度至中度CDAD的合理选择。观察到治疗失败没有差异;然而,口服万古霉素对于更高的风险患者可能是优选的,例如接受并发抗生素的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号