首页> 外文期刊>Turkish neurosurgery >Correlation of Preoperative Radiological Evaluation of Skull Base and Non-skull Base Meningiomas with Clinical and Surgical Data
【24h】

Correlation of Preoperative Radiological Evaluation of Skull Base and Non-skull Base Meningiomas with Clinical and Surgical Data

机译:颅底术前放射性评价与临床和外科脑脑脑脑脑脑脑脑脑膜瘤的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To determine whether neuroradiological assessment of skull base and non-skull base meningioma consistency and vascularity can be used to improve the surgical approach.MATERIAL and METHODS: Forty meningioma cases were split into skull base (n=16) and non-skull (n=24) base groups, and intraoperative surgical reports of observed tumor consistency (stiffness) and vascularity were compared with preoperative neuroradiological magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion and postoperative histopathological analysis of collagen and CD34 levels.RESULTS: The skull base group had significantly higher CD34 levels (p=0.004) than the non-skull base group. Further comparison of CD34 levels also revealed significantly higher CD34 levels (p=0.032) in transitional versus fibroblastic subtypes. Observation-based vascularity scoring did not reveal a significant correlation between tumor grade and relative cerebral blood volume (p=0.604). In contrast, there was a statistically modest, but significant correlation between intraoperative observation-based consistency and Verhoeff-van Gieson collagen scores (rs=0.400).CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of consistency and vascularity using MR imaging was ambiguous. Overall, one of the most important limiting factors was the subjective observational assessment of tumor consistency and vascularity by surgical teams.
机译:目的:为了确定颅底和非颅底脑膜瘤致脑常数和血管的神经加理学评估是否可用于改善手术方法。 N = 24)与术前神经加理磁共振(MR)灌注和术后组织病理学分析的碱基组,观察到的肿瘤稠度(刚度)和血管性的脑内手术报告与胶原蛋白和CD34水平的术后组织病理学分析。结果:颅底基团显着高得多CD34级别(p = 0.004)而不是非颅骨基组。 CD34水平的进一步比较也揭示过渡性与纤维细胞亚型中显着更高的CD34水平(P = 0.032)。基于观察的血管性评分没有揭示肿瘤级和相对脑血容量之间的显着相关性(P = 0.604)。相比之下,基于术中观察的一致性和verhoeff-van Gieson胶原蛋白分数(Rs = 0.400)之间存在统计上谦虚,但在术中观察的一致性和verhoeff-van Gieson的相关性显着总的来说,最重要的限制因素之一是手术团队对肿瘤稠度和血管的主观观察评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号