【24h】

Age of Red Cells for Transfusion and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis

机译:危重病患者的输血和结果的红细胞年龄:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Whether the age of red blood cells (RBCs) affects mortality after transfusion in critically ill patients is controversial. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to January 10, 2018 to identify systematic reviews or meta-analyses and published randomized controlled trials of the effects of fresh versus older blood transfusion on mortality of adults in the intensive care unit (ICU). There were no date restrictions, but the language was restricted to English. The primary outcome was mortality. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: We included six trials that enrolled 8,467 critically ill patients and compared fresh RBC transfusion with current standard practice. There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97, 1.12), 28/30-day mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96, 1.13), in-hospital mortality (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94, 1.19), and in-ICU mortality (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97,1.27) with fresh RBC transfusion compared with older blood transfusion. Conclusions: The study concluded that age of red cells for transfusion did not affect the outcomes in critically ill patients.
机译:目的:红细胞(RBCS)的年龄是否会影响重症患者的输血后发生死亡率是有争议的。方法:我们搜索了Medline,Embase,PubMed,Science和Cochrane图书馆的控制试验数据库,从2008年1月10日开始,以识别系统的评价或荟萃分析,并出版了新鲜与新鲜影响的随机对照试验重症监护股中成人死亡率的较老输血(ICU)。没有日期限制,但语言仅限于英语。主要结果是死亡率。计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们包括六项试验,注册了8,467名批判性病患者,并将新鲜RBC输血与当前的标准做法进行了比较。 90天死亡率没有显着差异(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.97,1.12),28/30天死亡率(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.96,1.13),住院死亡率(RR 1.06,95%,95% CI 0.94,1.19),和ICU死亡率(RR 1.11,95%CI 0.97,1.27),与较老的输血相比,新鲜RBC输血。结论:该研究得出结论认为,用于输血的红细胞年龄不会影响危重病患者的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号