首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion and apheresis science: official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis >Discrepancies between red cell phenotyping and genotyping in daily immunohematology laboratory practice
【24h】

Discrepancies between red cell phenotyping and genotyping in daily immunohematology laboratory practice

机译:日常免疫检验实验室实践中红细胞表型和基因分型之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

False-positive and false-negative reactions exist for serological and molecular antigen typing methods. If the predicted phenotype is inconsistent with the patient's known antibodies or serological phenotype, the discrepancy must be investigated. False-negative and false-positive results are clinically problematic in blood donors and patients. In this study, we investigated discrepant results between serology and molecular testing in patients and blood donors that occurred in daily molecular laboratory practice over a two year-period. SCD patients represented a large percentage of our cases of discrepancies but we also observed a high prevalence of discrepancies between phenotypes and genotypes in blood donors. The main reasons that led to discrepancies were recent transfusions and limitations of phenotyping. Discrepancies classified as false positive phenotype/true negative genotype and false negative phenotype/true positive genotype occurred mainly in patients with recent transfusions and individuals with RH variants while those classified as true negative phenotype/false positive genotype involved null phenotypes due to silent genes. Despite the limitations of molecular methods currently employed, we found more false-negative and false-positive phenotypes than genotypes demonstrating that genotyping is more efficient to define the blood types, especially in transfusion dependent patients.
机译:存在用于血清学和分子抗原打字方法的假阳性和假阴性反应。如果预测的表型与患者的已知抗体或血清学表型不一致,则必须研究差异。假阴性和假阳性结果是献血者和患者的临床问题。在这项研究中,我们在每日分子实验室实践中发生的患者和血液供体中的血清学和分子检测之间的差异结果调查了结果。 SCD患者代表着我们的差异案件的大量百分比,但我们还观察到献血者中表型和基因型之间的差异差异很高。导致差异的主要原因是最近输血和表型的限制。归类为假阳性表型/真正的阴性基因型和假阴性表型/真正阳性基因型的差异主要是患有RH变体的近期输血和个体的患者,而归类为真正的负表型/假阳性基因型涉及由于沉默基因的零表型。尽管目前采用的分子方法的局限性,但我们发现比表明基因分型更有效地定义血液类型,特别是在输血依赖性患者中更有效的基因型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号