首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Part B >Response to Waddington et al. on 'J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi'
【24h】

Response to Waddington et al. on 'J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi'

机译:回应Waddington等。 “核电站核电站核电站北京核电站事故”搬迁措施的“J价值评估”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a response to Waddington et al. who argue that there was insufficient public health benefit to justify the relocation of several hundred thousand individuals after the Chernobyl and perhaps Fukushima nuclear accidents. We believe the arguments are not defensible either from a radiological/public health point of view, or from a consideration of costs, and we are skeptical of the use of the "J-value assessment" as a foundation to reach these conclusions. There is debate about the health consequences of exposure to ionizing radiation; data on health impacts are often uncertain and incomplete, and therefore not the basis on which to hesitate to evacuate those affected. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这是对Waddington等人的回应。 谁认为,没有足够的公共卫生利益,以证明切尔诺贝利和福岛核事故后数十万个人的搬迁。 我们认为,从放射学/公共卫生的角度来看,或者从考虑到成本,争论是不可抗拒的,我们对使用“j价值评估”作为达到这些结论的基础持怀疑态度。 关于暴露电离辐射的健康后果存在争论; 关于健康影响的数据往往不确定和不完整,因此不是犹豫疏散受影响的基础。 (c)2018化学工程师机构。 elsevier b.v出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号