首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology Research >Evaluation of the relevance of DILI predictive hypotheses in early drug development: review of in vitro methodologies vs. BDDCS classification
【24h】

Evaluation of the relevance of DILI predictive hypotheses in early drug development: review of in vitro methodologies vs. BDDCS classification

机译:评价帝力预测假设在早期药物发展中的相关性:对体外方法的综述与BDDC分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major safety concern; it occurs frequently; it is idiosyncratic; it cannot be adequately predicted; and a multitude of underlying mechanisms has been postulated. A number of experimental approaches to predict human DILI have been proposed utilizing in vitro screening such as inhibition of mitochondrial function, hepatobiliary transporter inhibition, reactive metabolite formation with and without covalent binding, and cellular health, but they have achieved only minimal success. Several studies have shown total administered dose alone or in combination with drug lipophilicity to be correlated with a higher risk of DILI. However, it would be best to have a predictive DILI methodology early in drug development, long before the clinical dose is known. Here we discuss the extent to which Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) defining characteristics, independent of knowing actual drug pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and dose, can be used to evaluate prior published predictive proposals. Our results show that BDDCS Class 2 drugs exhibit the highest DILI severity, and that all of the short-lived published methodologies evaluated here, except when daily dose is known, do not yield markedly better predictions than BDDCS. The assertion that extensively metabolized compounds are at higher risk of developing DILI is confirmed, but can be enhanced by differentiating BDDCS Class 2 from Class 1 drugs. Conclusion: Our published analyses suggest that comparison of proposed DILI prediction methodologies with BDDCS classification is a useful tool to evaluate the potential reliability of newly proposed algorithms, although BDDCS classification itself is not sufficiently predictive. Almost all of the predictive DILI metrics do no better than just avoiding BDDCS Class 2 drugs, although some early data with microliver platforms enabling long-enduring metabolic competency show promising results.
机译:药物诱导的肝损伤(DILI)是一个主要的安全问题;它经常发生;这是一种特殊的;它不能充分预测;并且已经假设了多种潜在的机制。已经提出了许多预测人帝力的实验方法,这些方法是利用体外筛查,例如抑制线粒体功能,肝胆转运蛋白抑制,具有和无共价结合的反应性代谢物形成,但它们已经取得了最小的成功。几项研究表明,单独给予给药剂量,或与药物亲脂性的组合与较高的Dili风险相关。然而,在临床剂量已知之前,最好早在药物开发中具有预测的帝力方法。在这里,我们讨论了生物制冷药物处理分类系统(BDDC)定义特征的程度,无关,无关,无关,无论是如何知道实际的药物药代动力学/药效学和剂量,都可用于评估先前公布的预测性建议。我们的结果表明,BDDCS 2类药物表现出最高的DiRi严重程度,并且在这里评估的所有短期发表的方法,除非是日常剂量,除了BDDC,不会产生明显更好的预测。置位代谢化合物的断言处于较高的发育稀有风险,但可以通过将BDDCS 2与1类药物分化来增强。结论:我们发表的分析表明,使用BDDCS分类的提议帝力预测方法的比较是评估新提出的算法的潜在可靠性的有用工具,尽管BDDCS分类本身并不充分预测。几乎所有预测的Diri指标都不会比仅仅避免BDDCS 2类药物,尽管有一些早期数据,具有较长持久的代谢能力,可实现长期持久的代谢能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Toxicology Research》 |2018年第3期|共13页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号