...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology Letters: An International Journal Providing a Forum for Original and Pertinent Contributions in Toxicology Research >Environmental risk assessment for new human pharmaceuticals in the European Union according to the draft guideline/discussion paper of January 2001.
【24h】

Environmental risk assessment for new human pharmaceuticals in the European Union according to the draft guideline/discussion paper of January 2001.

机译:欧洲联盟新人类药物的环境风险评估根据2001年1月的指南/讨论文件草案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since 1993, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) for a new drug application has been stipulated by EU Directive 93/39/EEC amending Directive 65/65/EEC. In early 2001, after several unpublished draft versions for an ERA guideline, a draft guideline/discussion paper for an ERA for non-GMO-containing drugs was published by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA). The draft guideline describes a step-wise, tiered procedure for the ERA. The first tier consists of deriving a crude predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in the aquatic compartment for the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or its major metabolites, based on predicted amounts used and specific removal rates in sewage treatment or surface waters. If this crude PEC is <0.01 microg/l and no environmental concerns are apparent, no further assessment is deemed necessary. Else, in the second tier, a crude predicted no-effect level (PNEC) for the aquatic compartment is to be extrapolated by dividing the lowest 50%-effect concentration from acute ecotoxicity tests with algae, daphnia or fish (EC(50), LC(50)) by an assessment factor (usually 1000). If the ratio PEC/PNEC is <1, no further assessment is deemed necessary. Lastly, in the third tier, further considerations on a case-by-case basis are needed. This may encompass refining the environmental fate information and thereby the PEC, considering further environmental compartments and their respective PECs (up to and including field studies), but also refining the PNEC. While the ERA addresses mainly the API, excipients of the formulated drug should be considered as well. In the case of medicinal products, the benefit for patients has relative precedence over environmental risks, meaning that even in the case of an unacceptable residual risk for new drugs after third-tier considerations, prohibition of a new API is not taken into consideration. Instead, possible mitigating or precautionary safety measures may consist of specific product labelling (i.e. package leaflets for the patients regarding returning and proper disposal of unused medicines), restricted use through in-hospital or in-surgery administration under supervision only, or the recommendation of environmental analytical monitoring up to ecological field studies.
机译:自1993年以来,欧盟指令93/39 / EEC修订指令65/65 / EEC规定了新药物申请的环境风险评估(时代)。 2001年初,经过几项未公布的ERA指南的版本,欧洲药物评估机构(EMEA)出版了一项非转基因含药物的时代的准则/讨论文件草案。指南草案描述了时代的一步,分层过程。第一层包括基于污水处理或表面水域中使用的预测量和特定的去除率,从而衍生出在​​水生池中的粗糙预测环境浓度(PEC)或其主要代谢物。如果该粗PEC为<0.01 microg / l而且没有环境问题,则不需要进一步评估。否则,在第二层中,通过将来自急性生态毒性试验的最低50% - 藻类(EC(50), LC(50))通过评估因子(通常是1000)。如果比率PEC / PNEC为<1,则不需要进一步评估。最后,在第三层中,需要对案例基础的进一步考虑。这可能包括炼制环境命运信息,从而考虑进一步的环境舱及其各自的PEC(最多和包括现场研究),而且还改善了PNEC。虽然ERA主要地址主要是API,但也应考虑配制药物的赋形剂。在药用产品的情况下,患者的益处相对满足环境风险,这意味着即使在三层考虑因素后新药的剩余风险不可接受的剩余风险,也没有考虑禁止新的API。相反,可能的减轻或预防性安全措施可以包括特定的产品标签(即患者的封装传单,关于返还和适当处理未使用的药物),通过监督后的医院或外科管理局或外科管理局的限制使用,或建议生态实地研究的环境分析监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号