首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Quantification of Available Water Capacity Comparing Standard Methods and a Pedostructure Method on a Weakly Structured Soil
【24h】

Quantification of Available Water Capacity Comparing Standard Methods and a Pedostructure Method on a Weakly Structured Soil

机译:可用水能的定量比较标准方法和弱结构土壤的探测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the pedostructure concept to determine the soil available water capacity, specifically the field capacity (FC). Pedostructure describes the soil aggregate structure and its thermodynamic interactionwith water. Specifically, this work compared the calculation of soil water-holding properties based on the pedostructure concept with other standard methods for determining FC and permanent wilting point (PWP). The standard methods evaluated were the FAO texture estimate (FAO method), the Saxton-Rawls pedotransfer functions (PTFs method), and the water content at predefined soil suction (330 and 15,000 hPa) as measured with a pressure plate apparatus (PP method). Additionally, two pedostructure methodswere assessed: the thermodynamic water retention curve (TWRC method) and the thermodynamic pedostructure (TPC method). Undisturbed loamy fine sand soil from a field in Millican, Texas, was analyzed at both the Ap and E horizons. The results showed thatthe estimated water content at FC and PWP for the three standard methods andfor the TWRC method were in relative agreement. However, the TPC method used characteristic transition points in the modeled contents of different water pools in the soil aggregate and was higher for the Ap horizon, but in agreement with the other methods for the E horizon. For example, for the Ap horizon of the soil analyzed in this study, the FC estimated with the standard and TWRC methods rangedfrom 0.073 to 0.150 mo m'3sou,while the TPC method estimate was 0.221 mo m'3sou. Overall, the different methods showed good agreement in estimating the available water; however, the results also showed some variations in these estimates. It is clear that the TPC method has advantagesover the other methods in considering the soil aggregate structure and modeling the soil water content within the aggregate structure. The thermodynamic nature of the TPC method enabled the use of both the soil shrinkage curve and the water retention curve in a weakly structured soil. It is expected that the TPC method would provide more comprehensive advances in understanding the soil water-holding properties of structured soils with higher clay contents.
机译:本研究的目的是评估使用PedoStructure Concept以确定土壤可用水容量,特别是现场容量(Fc)。 PedoStructure描述了土壤骨料结构及其热力学互动。具体而言,这项工作比较了基于PedoStructure Concept的土壤水控性能计算,以确定Fc和永久性衰竭点(PWP)的其他标准方法。评估的标准方法是粮农组织纹理估计(粮农组织方法),萨克斯顿 - 罗尔斯网兜传递功能(PTFS方法),用压板装置(PP方法)测量的预定义土壤吸力(330和15,000hPa)处的水含量(PP方法) 。另外,评估了两个PedoStructure方法:热力学水保持曲线(TWRC方法)和热力学进程(TPC方法)。在德克萨斯州的米兰米兰的一个领域未受干扰的植物细砂土壤,在AP和E视野中分析。结果表明,关于三个标准方法的Fc和PWP的估计含水量和TWRC方法是相对协议。然而,TPC方法在土壤聚集体中的不同水池的建模含量中使用了特征过渡点,适用于AP地平线,但与其他方法一致进行e orch。例如,对于本研究分析的土壤的AP地平线,用标准和TWRC方法估计的FC从0.073到0.150 Mo M'3sous,而TPC方法估计为0.221Mo M'3sou。总体而言,不同的方法表明估计可用水有良好的一致;然而,结果也显示出这些估计的一些变化。很明显,TPC方法具有优点,即考虑土壤骨料结构和将土壤含水量建模在骨料结构内的其他方法。 TPC方法的热力学性质使得在弱结构的土壤中使用土壤收缩曲线和水保持曲线。预计TPC方法将提供更全面的进步,以了解具有更高粘土含量的结构土壤的土壤水持性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号