首页> 外文期刊>Toxicological sciences: An official journal of the Society of Toxicology >Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test
【24h】

Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test

机译:系统审查框架对毒理学试验方法评估的适应:用斑马鱼胚胎毒性检验挑战和经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Systematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. Thismethodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. Although some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced prenatal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.
机译:系统审查方法是通过结构化,一致,透明的相关科学证据的透明考试来解决特定问题的手段。这种方法已经用于临床医学的优势,并且正在适用于其他学科。虽然已经探索了一些毒理学的应用,但特别是对于危害鉴定,本培养研究是我们的知识,首次试图使其适应毒理学测试方法的评估。作为我们的测试案例,我们选择了斑马鱼胚胎毒性试验(Zet)用于发育毒性及其哺乳动物对应物,标准哺乳动物产前发育毒性研究,重点研究Zet如何预测化学诱导的产前发育毒性的存在或不存在在哺乳动物研究中观察到。跨学科团队编制了一个系统审查协议,并在整个驾驶阶段调整了它,需要。最终议定书已登记并指导主要研究(系统审查),该议定书将全面回答审查问题。该培养研究的目标是将系统审查方法转化为毒理学测试方法性能的评估。因此,它专注于遇到的方法论问题,而主要研究将报告实质性调查结果。这些涉及许多系统审查步骤,但主要是为了搜索和选择证据。应用于这些挑战的经验教训可以不仅可以改善我们的主要研究,但也可能对寻求使用系统审查方法来比较毒理学测试方法的别人有所帮助。我们结束了一系列建议,如果通过,将有助于提高出版文献的质量,并使毒理学研究的系统审查更快,随着时间的推移更容易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号