首页> 外文期刊>Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis: an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis >Comparison of arterial and venous whole blood clot initiation, formation, and strength by thromboelastography in anesthetized swine
【24h】

Comparison of arterial and venous whole blood clot initiation, formation, and strength by thromboelastography in anesthetized swine

机译:血栓弹力图比较麻醉猪的动脉和静脉全血凝块的形成,形成和强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thromboelastography (TEG) analysis was used to determine if differences exist between venous and arterial samples in anesthetized swine, using identical sampling techniques for each of the samples. We hypothesized that TEG parameters would not differ between native whole blood venous and arterial samples. Thirty male Landrace swines were included in the study. Both the femoral artery and vein were catheterized using standard cut-down techniques and with identically sized catheters to rule out any catheter size effects on the results. Standard TEG parameters for native whole venous and arterial blood samples (r, K, α, MA, G, and coagulation index) were measured or calculated, and t-test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test used for comparison when appropriate. Significant differences were detected for r (venous < arterial), K (venous < arterial), α (venous > arterial), and coagulation index (venous > arterial) TEG parameters. No significant differences were measured for MA or G. These differences are important, especially when temporal changes in TEG are utilized to monitor patient stability and fluid therapy protocols using trends in coagulation properties. Taken together, these results suggest that clots are more likely to form at a faster rate in venous samples compared to arterial samples, but the overall clot strength does not differ. Therefore, if TEG analysis is being used to monitor coagulation profiles in a patient, care should be taken to use the same site and technique if results are to be used for comparative purposes.
机译:使用血栓弹力图(TEG)分析来确定麻醉猪中静脉和动脉样本之间是否存在差异,并对每个样本使用相同的采样技术。我们假设TEG参数在天然全血静脉和动脉样本之间不会有所不同。该研究包括三十只雄性长白猪。股动脉和静脉均使用标准切开技术并使用尺寸相同的导管进行插管,以排除任何导管尺寸对结果的影响。测量或计算天然全静脉和动脉血样品的标准TEG参数(r,K,α,MA,G和凝血指数),并在适当时使用t检验或Mann-Whitney秩和检验进行比较。检测到r(静脉<动脉),K(静脉<动脉),α(静脉>动脉)和凝血指数(静脉>动脉)TEG参数存在显着差异。没有测量到MA或G的显着差异。这些差异很重要,尤其是当TEG的时间变化用于利用凝血特性趋势来监测患者的稳定性和液体治疗方案时。综上所述,这些结果表明,与动脉样品相比,在静脉样品中血凝块更可能以更快的速率形成,但总血块强度没有差异。因此,如果将TEG分析用于监测患者的凝血情况,则应注意使用相同的部位和技术,以将结果用于比较目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号