...
首页> 外文期刊>AIDS care. >Voices of decision makers on evidence-based policy: A case of evolving TB/HIV co-infection policy in India
【24h】

Voices of decision makers on evidence-based policy: A case of evolving TB/HIV co-infection policy in India

机译:决策者对基于证据的政策的声音:印度不断发展的结核病/艾滋病毒共同感染政策的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explores decision makers' perspectives on evidence-based policy (EBP) development using the case of TB/HIV co-infection in India. Twelve in-depth interviews were conducted with purposively selected key national and international policy decision makers in India. Verbatim transcripts were processed and analysed thematically using QSR (NUD*IST 6). The decision makers were unequivocal in recognizing the TB/HIV co-infection as an important public health issue in India and stated the problem to be different than Africa. The need of having a "third programme" for co-infection was not felt. According to them, the public health management of this co-infection must be within the realm of these two programmes. The study also emphasized on decision makers' perspectives on evidence and the process of utilization of evidence for decision-making for co-infection. Study findings showed global evidence was not always accepted by the decision makers and study shows several examples of decision makers demanding local evidence for policy decisions. Decision makers did make interim policies based on global evidence but most of the time their mandate was to get local evidence. Thus, operations research/implementation science especially multi-centric studies emerge as important strategy for EBP development. Researcher-policy maker interface was a gap where role of researcher as aggressive communicator of research findings was expected.
机译:这项研究使用印度的TB / HIV合并感染病例,探讨了决策者对循证政策(EBP)发展的观点。与印度故意选择的主要国家和国际政策决策者进行了十二次深入访谈。使用QSR(NUD * IST 6)对逐字记录进行处理和主题分析。决策者明确承认结核病/艾滋病毒合并感染是印度的一个重要公共卫生问题,并表示该问题与非洲不同。没有感觉到需要针对合并感染的“第三项计划”。他们认为,这种合并感染的公共卫生管理必须在这两个计划的范围之内。该研究还强调了决策者对证据的观点以及为共感染决策制定证据的过程。研究结果表明,决策者并不总是接受全球证据,而研究表明,决策者需要一些当地决策证据的例子。决策者确实根据全球证据制定了临时政策,但是大多数时候他们的任务是获取当地证据。因此,运筹学/实施科学,尤其是多中心研究成为EBP发展的重要策略。研究者与政策制定者的接口是一个空白,期望研究者作为研究结果的积极传播者发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号