...
首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task
【24h】

Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task

机译:序列学习的预期措施:手动与串行反应时间任务的动血管版本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The serial reaction time (SRT) task has generated a very large amount of research. Nevertheless the debate continues as to the exact cognitive processes underlying implicit sequence learning. Thus, the first goal of this study is to elucidate the underlying cognitive processes enabling sequence acquisition. We therefore compared reaction time (RT) in sequence learning in a standard manual activated (MA) to that in an ocular activated (OA) version of the task, within a single experimental setting. The second goal is to use eye movement measures to compare anticipation, as an additional indication of sequence learning, between the two versions of the SRT. Performance of the group given the MA version of the task (n = 29) was compared with that of the group given the OA version (n = 30). The results showed that although overall, RT was faster for the OA group, the rate of sequence learning was similar to that of the MA group performing the standard version of the SRT. Because the stimulus-response association is automatic and exists prior to training in the OA task, the decreased reaction time in this version of the task reflects a purer measure of the sequence learning that occurs in the SRT task. The results of this study show that eye tracking anticipation can be measured directly and can serve as a direct measure of sequence learning. Finally, using the OA version of the SRT to study sequence learning presents a significant methodological contribution by making sequence learning studies possible among populations that struggle to perform manual responses.
机译:连续反应时间(SRT)任务产生了大量的研究。尽管如此,辩论仍然是隐式序列学习的完全认知过程。因此,本研究的第一个目的是阐明潜在的认知过程,使序列采集。因此,我们在单个实验设置中,在标准手动中的标准手动(MA)中的序列学习中比较了反应时间(RT)。第二个目标是使用眼睛运动措施来比较预期,作为序列学习的额外指示,在SRT的两个版本之间。给定针对任务的MA版本(n = 29)的组的性能与给定OA版本的组(n = 30)进行比较。结果表明,虽然整体而言,OA集团的RT更快,但序列学习率类似于执行SRT标准版本的MA组的速率。由于刺激 - 响应关联是自动的,并且在OA任务中训练之前存在,因此该任务版本中的反应时间降低反映了SRT任务中发生的序列学习的更纯度测量。该研究的结果表明,眼部跟踪预期可以直接测量,可以作为序列学习的直接测量。最后,使用SRT的OA版本来研究序列学习通过在努力执行手动响应的群体中进行序列学习研究,提出了显着的方法论贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号