...
【24h】

Scintimammography with high resolution dedicated breast camera and mammography in multifocal, multicentric and bilateral breast cancer detection: a comparative study

机译:具有高分辨率专用乳房相机和乳房X线照相术的瞬息,多中心和双侧乳腺癌检测:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare preoperative planar scintimammography (SM) with high resolution dedicated breast camera (DBC) and conventional mammography in the detection of multifocal, multicentric and bilateral breast cancer and its impact on surgical planning.Methods. A series of 264 consecutive patients, 232 with breast cancer and 32 with benign lesions, underwent [99mXc]tetrofosmin planar SM with a newly developed DBC (LumaGEM 3200S/12K, Gamma Medica-Ideas Inc.). Scintigraphic with mammography data were compared and correlated with histopathological findings. Results. At surgery, ipsilateral multifocal or multicentric breast cancer in 40 patients, invasive in 24 cases (group 1) and in situ in 16 (group 2) was ascertained, and synchronous bilateral breast cancer in 4 patients (group 3). Globally, SM was positive for cancer in 41 out of the 44 breast cancer patients (93.2%) and mammography was positive in 40 out of 44 (90.1%). SM revealed multifocal/multicentric disease in 87.5% of group 1/goup 2 patients and mammography in 47.5% (p<0.0005): SM detected a significantly higher number of additional invasive foci than mammography (89.6% vs 37.9%, p<0.0005); only SM revealed ipsilateral multifocali-ty/multicentricity in 35% of cases. Bilaterality was detected by SM in 100% of group 3 patients and by mammography in 75%. Overall specificity was 88.2% for SM and 52.9% for mammography. SM correctly changed surgical management in 16% of cases.Conclusion. DBC planar SM proved a more highly sensitive diagnostic method than mammography in the pre-operative assessment of both ipsilateral multifocal/multicentric breast cancer and synchronous bilateral breast cancer. The procedure contributed to correctly changing patient surgical management in some cases, suggesting its -wider use complementary to mammography.
机译:目的。本研究的目的是将术前平面攻击性(SM)与高分辨率专用乳房摄像机(DBC)和常规乳房X线摄影进行比较,并在检测多焦点,多中心和双侧乳腺癌及其对外科策划的影响​​。方法。一系列264名连续患者,232例,乳腺癌和32例,具有良性病变,接受了[99Mxc]四面体Planar SM,具有新开发的DBC(Lumagem 3200s / 12k,Gamma Medica-Ideas Inc.)。比较与乳房X线摄影数据的闪烁术与组织病理学发现相关。结果。在手术中,40例患者中的同侧多焦点或多中心乳腺癌,24例(第1组)和16名(第2组)原位的侵入性,并在4名患者中同步双侧乳腺癌(第3组)。在全球范围内,SM对于44名乳腺癌患者中的41例(93.2%)和乳房X线照相术为40分中的40分(90.1%)。 SM揭示了87.5%组患者和乳房X线照相术中的多焦点/多中心疾病47.5%(P <0.0005):SM检测到比乳房X线摄影的额外额外的侵入灶(89.6%Vs 37.9%)显着更高的额外侵入性焦点(89.6%,P <0.0005) ;只有SM显示35%的病例中的IpsilateLal Multifocali-Ty / Multicricity。在3例患者的100%和75%的乳房X线摄影中,SM通过SM检测到两侧。 SM的总体特异性为88.2%,乳房X线摄影为52.9%。 SM在16%的情况下正确改变手术管理。结论。 DBC Planar SM证明了比乳房X线摄影更高度敏感的诊断方法,在术前评估同侧多元乳腺癌和同步双侧乳腺癌。该程序有助于在某些情况下正确改变患者手术管理,表明其互受乳房X光检查的互补。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号