QSOFA score in identifying the septic patients according to Sepsis 1.0 or Sepsis 2.0, putting new wine into old bottles?

Zhou Xianshi; Wu Fanwei

首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >QSOFA score in identifying the septic patients according to Sepsis 1.0 or Sepsis 2.0, putting new wine into old bottles?

【24h】

QSOFA score in identifying the septic patients according to Sepsis 1.0 or Sepsis 2.0, putting new wine into old bottles?

机译：根据败血症1.0或败血症2.0鉴定脓毒症患者的QSOFA评分，将新葡萄酒放入旧瓶子中？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《The American journal of emergency medicine》 |2019年第2期|共3页
作者
Zhou Xianshi; Wu Fanwei;
展开▼
作者单位

Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med Emergency Dept Guangzhou 510120 Guangdong Peoples R China;

Baoan TCM Hosp Grp Famous Doctor Hall 25 2nd Yuan Rd Shenzhen 518133 Peoples R China;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类治疗学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. QSOFA score in identifying the septic patients according to Sepsis 1.0 or Sepsis 2.0, putting new wine into old bottles? [J] . Zhou Xianshi, Wu Fanwei The American journal of emergency medicine . 2019,第2期

机译：根据败血症1.0或败血症2.0鉴定脓毒症患者的QSOFA评分，将新葡萄酒放入旧瓶子中？
2. The Combined SIRS plus qSOFA (qSIRS) Score is More Accurate Than qSOFA Alone in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Surgical Sepsis in an LMIC Emergency Department [J] . World Journal of Surgery: Official Journal of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie, Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, and of the International Association of Endocrine Surgeons . 2020,第1期

机译：联合的SIRS加上QSOFA（QSIRS）得分比单独的QSOFA更准确，仅在LMIC急诊部门的手术败血症患者中预测死亡率
3. Derivation of a screen to identify severe sepsis and septic shock in the ED-BOMBARD vs. SIRS and qSOFA [J] . Rothrock Steven G., Cassidy David D., Bienvenu Drew, The American journal of emergency medicine . 2019,第7期

机译：筛选筛选，以鉴定Ed-Bombard与Sirs和Qsofa的严重败血症和脓毒症休克
4. Blood Glucose and Sepsis Score on Sepsis Patients Requiring Insylin Therapy [C] . Fatanah Mohamad Suhaimi, Ummu Kulthum Jamaludin, Normy Norfiza Abdul Razak International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Sciences . 2018

机译：血糖和败血症评分需要胰岛素治疗的败血症患者
5. Integration of Recognition, Diagnostic, and Treatment Strategies between Prehospital Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Emergency Departments in the Management of Patients with Acute Sepsis and Septic Shock [D] . Duguay, Darren Caine. 2019

机译：在急性脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者管理中，在急性应急医疗服务和医院急诊部门之间的识别，诊断和治疗策略的整合
6. Comparison of qSOFA and SOFA score for predicting mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department of a low middle income country [O] . Muhammad Akbar Baig, Sadaf Sheikh, Erfaan Hussain, 2018

机译：比较qSOFA和SOFA评分来预测中低收入国家急诊部门严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
7. Comparison of QSOFA score and SIRS criteria for prediction of sepsis outcome of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study [O] . Maryamsadat Mosavi, lida Mahfoozi 2021

机译：QSOFA得分和SIRS标准的比较，以预测脓毒症患者脓毒症患者外脓毒症外的患者：单中心回顾性研究

QSOFA score in identifying the septic patients according to Sepsis 1.0 or Sepsis 2.0, putting new wine into old bottles?

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅