首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >y Load Adaptability in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
【24h】

y Load Adaptability in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

机译:Y肺动脉高压患者的y负载适应性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Right ventricular (RV) adaptation to pressure overload is a major prognostic factor in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objectives were first to define the relation between RV adaptation and load using allometric modeling, then to compare the prognostic value of different indices of load adaptability in PAH. Both a derivation (n = 85) and a validation cohort (n = 200) were included. Load adaptability was assessed using 3 approaches: (1) surrogates of ventriculo-arterial coupling (e.g., RV area change/endsystolic area), (2) simple ratio of function and load (e.g., tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/right ventricular systolic pressure), and (3) indices assessing the proportionality of adaptation using allometric pressure-function or size modeling. Proportional hazard modeling was used to compare the hazard ratio for the outcome of death or lung transplantation. The mean age of the derivation cohort was 44 +/- 11 years, with 80% female and 74% in New York Heart Association class HI or IV. Mean pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) was 24 +/- 11 with a wide distribution (1.6 to 57.5 WU/m(2)). Allometric relations were observed between PVRI and RV fractional area change (R-2 = 0.53, p < 0.001) and RV end systolic area indexed to body surface area right ventricular end-systolic area index (RVESAI) (R-2 = 0.29, p < 0.001), allowing the derivation of simple ratiometric load-specific indices of RV adaptation. In right heart parameters, RVESAI was the strongest predictor of outcomes (hazard ratio per SD = 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 2.75, p < 0.001). Although RVESAI/PVRI0.35 provided small incremental discrimination on multivariate modeling, none of the load-adaptability indices provided stronger discrimination of outcome than simple RV adaptation metrics in either the derivation or the validation cohort. In conclusion, allometric modeling enables quantification of the proportionality of RV load adaptation but offers small incremental prognostic value to RV end-systolic dimension in PAH. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:右心室(RV)适应压力过载是肺动脉高压患者(PAH)的主要预后因素。首先,目标是使用同传建模来定义RV适应和负载之间的关系,然后比较PAH中加载适应性不同索引的预后价值。包括派生(n = 85)和验证队列(n = 200)。使用3条方法评估负载适应性:(1)脑室 - 动脉偶联的替代物(例如,RV区域变化/末端区域),(2)功能和负载的简单比(例如,三尖瓣环形平面收缩偏移/右心室收缩压(3)使用各种压力函数或尺寸建模评估适应按比例的指标。比例危险建模用于比较死亡或肺移植结果的危险比。衍生队的平均年龄为44 +/- 11岁,女性80%和74%的纽约心脏关联类嗨或IV。平均肺血管抗性指数(PVRI)为24 +/- 11,宽分布(1.6至57.5 Wu / m(2))。在PVRI和R-2 = 0.53,p <0.001)和RV端收缩区域对体表面积右心室结束 - 收缩区指数(R-2 = 0.29,P <0.001),允许衍生RV自适应的简单比率载荷指标。在右心参数中,瓦尔是最强的预测因子(每SD危险比= 1.93,95%置信区间1.37至2.75,P <0.001)。虽然rvesai / pvri0.35提供了对多变量建模的小增量歧视,但负载适应性指数都没有提供比推导或验证队列的简单RV适应度量更强的结果辨别。总之,各种造型使得能够定量RV负载适应的比例,但在PAH中为RV端收缩维度提供小的增量预后值。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号