How Trialists and Pharmaceutical Sponsors Have Failed Us by Thinking That Acute Heart Failure Is a 48-Hour Illness

摘要

Trials of novel therapies for acute heart failure (HF) have followed a convention of short term, most commonly a 48-hour infusion of parenteral therapy compared with placebo or an active drug in a randomized, double-blind study design. Such trials include OPTIMECHF, SURVIVE, VERITAS, PROTECT, ASCEND-HF, TRUE-HF, and RELAX-AHF-2. This article reviews how this practice in trials began and summarizes the reasons why such a brief exposure of any novel therapy has failed to reduce the end points of rehospitalization or death. Future trials should consider acute and extended use of novel agents to better match the pathophysiology of decompensation and recovery from acute HF. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.