...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Inpatient versus outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy at home for acute infections in children: a systematic review
【24h】

Inpatient versus outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy at home for acute infections in children: a systematic review

机译:住院患者对儿童急性感染的住院患者与门诊肠外抗生素治疗:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Inpatient management is necessary in many situations, but medical and allied-health treatments are increasingly being used on an outpatient basis to allow patients who would traditionally have been admitted to hospital to remain at home. Home-based clinical management has many potential benefits, including reduced hospital-acquired infections, cost savings, and patient and family satisfaction. Studies in adults provide evidence for the benefits of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotics, but few studies inform practice in home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for children. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, satisfaction, and cost of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for acute infections in children. We searched MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to Jan 31, 2017) and Embase (from Jan 1, 1974, to Jan 31, 2017) for studies investigating home-based and hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy and assessed them for quality. 2827 articles were identified and 19 studies were included in the systematic review. Efficacy results differed between studies depending on the outcome assessed. The incidence of complications and readmission to hospital was similar for hospital-based and home-based treatments. In seven (47%) of 15 studies, patients who had all or part of their treatment at home received treatment for longer than patients who were treated entirely in hospital. No studies showed that home-based treatment was less safe than hospital-based treatment. In all studies in which treatment satisfaction or costs were assessed, home-based treatment was satisfactory to patients or patients' families and less expensive per episode than hospital-based treatment by 30–75%. Thus, home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy might be popular and cost-effective, but randomised studies of the efficacy of this strategy are needed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42015024406).
机译:在许多情况下,住院治疗是必要的,但越来越多地使用医疗和盟国健康治疗,以便在门诊基础上使用,以便允许传统上被承认医院留在家里的患者。家庭临床管理具有许多潜在的益处,包括减少医院获得的感染,成本节约和患者和家庭满意度。成人的研究为家庭基于医院的静脉内抗生素的益处提供了证据,但很少有研究以儿童为基础的家庭静脉抗生素治疗提供信息。我们系统地审查了家庭基于医院的静脉内抗生素治疗的疗效,安全性,满意度和成本,用于儿童的急性感染。我们搜索了Medline(从1946年1月1日起,2017年1月31日)和Embase(从1974年1月1日起到2017年1月31日)研究研究基于家庭和医院的静脉内抗生素治疗,并评估它们的质量。鉴定了2827篇文章,系统审查中包含19项研究。根据评估的结果,研究之间的疗效结果不同。医院并发症和入院的发病率类似于医院和家庭的治疗方法。在七项(47%)的15项研究中,在家庭中拥有全部或部分治疗的患者比在医院完全治疗的患者的治疗。没有研究表明,基于家庭的治疗不如基于医院治疗的安全性。在评估治疗满意度或成本的所有研究中,家庭治疗对患者或患者的家庭令人满意,每集比医院的治疗较低,较便宜30-75%。因此,家庭的静脉内抗生素治疗可能是流行且经济效益的,但需要随机研究这种策略的功效。此系统审查在Prospero(CRD42015024406)注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号