首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Impact of Pelvic Radiation Therapy on Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates
【24h】

Impact of Pelvic Radiation Therapy on Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates

机译:盆腔辐射治疗对充气阴茎假体重新进入率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IntroductionConsidering that radiation therapy (RT) compromises soft tissue microvasculature, impairs wound healing, and causes cavernosal fibrosis, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) outcomes may be adversely affected in men treated with RT. AimTo compare IPP outcomes among those who had undergone prior RT vs a cohort who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) before insertion of IPP. MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Database was queried for men with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RT (n?= 83,277) or RP (n?= 32,608) with subsequent IPP insertion between 2002 and 2013. Men who had undergone both RT and RP were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcome MeasureThe primary outcome was reoperation, defined by removal, revision, or replacement of the IPP. ResultsWe identified 350 men who received an IPP following RT and 653 who received an IPP following RP. Men who underwent RT were older (P< .01) and had more comorbidities (P< .01). There were no significant differences in overall reoperation rates at 90 days (P?= .78), 1 year (P?= .52), or 3 years (P?= .48). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated that RT was not associated with an increased likelihood of overall reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–2.29,P?= .09). There was no association between time from RT to IPP and overall reoperation rates. Clinical ImplicationsPrior RT for the treatment of PCa does not impact the revision or removal rates of IPPs as compared with a cohort of non-radiated patients who underwent RP. Strength & LimitationsThe strength includes the analysis of outcomes among a contemporary, nationwide cohort with robust follow-up. Using diagnosis and procedure codes, we were thoroughly able to capture reoperations. Limitations include the lack of specific indications for reoperation and inability to control for surgeon experience or technique. ConclusionIPP is a safe and effective treatment of erectile dysfunction that should be offered to men with a history of pelvic radiation who have failed medical therapy.Golan R, Patel NA, Sun T, et?al. Impact of pelvic radiation therapy on inflatable penile prosthesis reoperation rates. J Sex Med 2018;15:1653–1658.
机译:引入放射治疗(RT)损害软组织微血管,损害伤口愈合,并导致气孔纤维化,可充气阴茎假体(IPP)结果可能因RT治疗的男性可能受到不利影响。 AIMTO比较IPP成果,在插入IPP之前接受了接受自由基前列腺切除术(RP)的群组的IPP结果。方法验证,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-MedicARE数据库被针对具有前列腺癌(PCA)的男性进行癌症(N?= 83,277)或RP(n?= 32,608),随后2002和2013之间的IPP插入。经过RT和RP的男性被排除在分析之外。主要结果测量主要结果是重新进食,通过移除,修订或更换IPP而定义。 ResultSwe确定了350名接收到RT和653之后的IPP的男性,谁接受了RP之后的IPP。接受RT的男性较旧(P <.01)并具有更多的合并症(P <.01)。在90天内整体重组率没有显着差异(p?= .78),1年(p?= .52)或3年(p?= .48)。时间到事件分析证明RT与总重组的可能性没有增加(危险比[HR] 1.46,95%置信区间[CI] 0.94-2.29,P?= .09)。从RT到IPP之间没有关联和总体重新进入率。与接受RP的非辐射患者的群体相比,PCA治疗的临床含义RT不会影响IPP的修订或移除率。强度和限制力量包括在当代,全国范围内的群组中的结果分析,具有稳健的随访。使用诊断和程序代码,我们彻底才能捕获重新进展。限制包括缺乏用于重新操作和无法控制外科医生经验或技术的具体指示。结案是一种安全有效地治疗勃起功能障碍,应该为具有失败的医疗治疗失败的骨盆辐射历史的男性.GOLAN R,PATEL NA,SUN T,ET?AL。盆腔放射治疗对充气阴茎假体重新进入率的影响。 J SEX MED 2018; 15:1653-1658。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号