首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >Breakfast Is Brain Food? The Effect on Grade Point Average of a Rural Group Randomized Program to Promote School Breakfast
【24h】

Breakfast Is Brain Food? The Effect on Grade Point Average of a Rural Group Randomized Program to Promote School Breakfast

机译:早餐是大脑食物? 农村组随机计划促进学校早餐的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Adolescents frequently miss breakfast which may impact cognitive, academic, and health outcomes. This analysis describes the effect of a trial to assess school level changes to increase breakfast consumption on grade point average (GPA). METHODS Sixteen rural Minnesota high schools were randomized to a policy and environmental change intervention or delayed intervention (control) group. Baseline screening identified, randomly selected and enrolled 9th and 10th grade students who eat breakfast ≤3 times per school week for assessment. Mean unweighted GPA was provided by 13 schools for 636 students. Student‐level and administrative data were used for sociodemographic and free or reduced‐price meals (FRPM). Linear mixed models and latent class analysis (LCA) were used to assess change in GPA. RESULTS Students were 54% female, 76% white, and 34% received FRPM. Unweighted cumulative GPA mean?=?2.82 (0.78) at baseline. There was no significant intervention effect on GPA postintervention or 1‐year follow‐up. LCA revealed two classes: “higher” (N?=?495) and “lower” (N?=?141) resource. There was an intervention effect among low‐resource students from baseline to 1‐year post only among the control condition (delayed intervention). CONCLUSIONS In combination with the full study results, increasing breakfast consumption may have an impact particularly for low resource students.
机译:抽象背景青少年经常想念早餐,可能会影响认知,学术和健康结果。该分析描述了审判评估学校水平变化的效果,以提高年级平均值(GPA)的早餐消费。方法有十六村的明尼苏达高中被随机分为政策和环境变更干预或延迟干预(控制)集团。基线筛查确定,随机选择和注册的第9和10年级学生每学校每周吃早餐≤3次进行评估。平均未加权的GPA由13所学校提供636名学生。学生级别和行政数据用于社会造影和自由或廉价的餐点(FRPM)。线性混合模型和潜在类分析(LCA)用于评估GPA的变化。结果学生女性为54%,白色76%,34%收到FRPM。未加权的累积GPA意味着什么?=?2.82(0.78)在基线时。对GPA后无法进行的显着干预效果或1年随访。 LCA揭示了两类:“更高”(n?=?495)和“下”(n?=?141)资源。低资源学生的干预效果仅在控制条件(延迟干预)之间从基线到1年的职位。结论结合完整的研究成果,早餐消费量增加可能对低资源学生产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号