首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Management of penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries: A meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma
【24h】

Management of penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries: A meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

机译:渗透腹膜内转子损伤的管理:来自创伤外科的东部协会的META分析和实践管理指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The management of penetrating colon injuries in civilians has evolved over the last four decades. The objectives of this meta-analysis are to evaluate the current treatment regimens available for penetrating colon injuries and assess the role of anastomosis in damage control surgery to develop a practice management guideline for surgeons. METHODS Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, a subcommittee of the Practice Management Guidelines section of EAST conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE and EMBASE articles from 1980 through 2017. We developed three relevant problem, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions regarding penetrating colon injuries. Outcomes of interest included mortality and infectious abdominal complications. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were identified for analysis, of which 16 met criteria for quantitative meta-analysis and included 705 patients considered low-risk in six prospective randomized studies. Seven hundred thirty-eight patients in 10 studies undergoing damage control laparotomy and repair or resection and anastomosis (R&A) were included in a separate meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of high-risk patients undergoing repair or R&A was not feasible due to inadequate data. CONCLUSIONS In adult civilian patients sustaining penetrating colon injury without signs of shock, significant hemorrhage, severe contamination, or delay to surgical intervention we recommend that colon repair or R&A be performed rather than routine colostomy. In adult high-risk civilian trauma patients sustaining penetrating colon injury, we conditionally recommend that colon repair or R&A be performed rather than routine colostomy. In adult civilian trauma patients sustaining penetrating colon injury who had damage control laparotomy, we conditionally recommend that routine colostomy not be performed; instead, definitive repair or delayed R&A or anastomosis at initial operation should be performed rather than routine Copyright (c) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:背景技术在过去的四十年里,平民渗透到平民的冒险伤害的管理已经进化。该荟萃分析的目的是评估目前用于渗透结肠损伤的治疗方案,并评估吻合在损伤对照手术中的作用,以制定外科医生的实践管理指南。方法采用建议评估,发展和评估(等级)方法的分级,东部实践管理指南的小组委员会使用Medline和Embase文章从1980年到2017年进行了系统审查。我们制定了三个相关问题,干预,比较以及关于渗透结肠伤害的结果(pico)问题。感兴趣的结果包括死亡率和传染性腹部并发症。结果鉴定了三十七项研究进行了分析,其中16个定量荟萃分析标准,包括705名患者在六项前瞻性随机研究中被认为是低风险的。在单独的荟萃分析中,七百三十八名患者患有损伤控制锁伤术和修复或切除或切除和吻合(R&A)。由于数据不足,高风险患者的高风险患者的荟萃分析是不可行的。结论在成人民用患者中维持穿透性结肠损伤,没有休克迹象,显着出血,严重污染或延迟手术干预,我们建议进行结肠修复或R&A而不是常规光环造口术。在成人高风险的平民创伤患者中持续穿透性结肠损伤,我们有条件地建议进行结肠修复或R&A而不是常规光环造口术。在成人民用创伤患者中,维持渗透性剖腹症患者患有损伤的剖腹产术,我们有条件地建议不进行常规光凝术;相反,应执行最明确的修复或延迟的R&A或吻合术,而不是常规版权(c)2018 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号