首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Systematic review of oxygenation and clinical outcomes to inform oxygen targets in critically ill trauma patients
【24h】

Systematic review of oxygenation and clinical outcomes to inform oxygen targets in critically ill trauma patients

机译:系统审查氧合和临床结果,以告知氧靶标记不良患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Oxygen therapy is frequently administered to critically ill trauma patients to avoid hypoxia, but optimal oxygenation strategies are not clear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of oxygen targets and clinical outcomes in trauma and critically ill patients. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection from 1946 through 2017. Our initial search yielded 14,774 articles with 209 remaining after abstract review. We reviewed full text articles of human subjects with conditions of interest, an oxygen exposure or measurement, and clinical outcomes, narrowing the review to 43 articles. We assessed article quality using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Of the 43 final studies meeting inclusions criteria, 17 focused on trauma and 26 studies focused on medical and/or surgical critical illness without trauma specifically. Four trauma studies supported lower oxygenation/normoxia, two supported higher oxygenation, and 11 supported neither normoxia nor higher oxygenation (five neutral and six supported avoidance of hypoxia). Fifteen critical illness studies supported lower oxygenation/normoxia, one supported higher oxygenation, and 10 supported neither normoxia nor higher oxygenation (nine neutral and one supported avoidance of hypoxia). We identified seven randomized controlled trials (four high quality, three moderate quality). Of the high-quality randomized controlled trials (none trauma-related), one supported lower oxygenation/normoxia and three were neutral. Of the moderate-quality randomized controlled trials (one trauma-related), one supported higher oxygenation, one was neutral, and one supported avoidance of hypoxia. Conclusion: We identified few trauma-specific studies beyond traumatic brain injury; none were high quality. Extrapolating primarily from nontrauma critical illness, reduced oxygen administration targeting normoxia in critically ill trauma patients may result in better or equivalent clinical outcomes. Additional trauma-specific trials are needed to determine the optimal oxygen strategy in critically injured patients. Level of evidence: Systematic review, level IV.
机译:背景:经常给氧气治疗施用至关重要的创伤患者以避免缺氧,但最佳的氧合策略尚不清楚。方法:我们对创伤和危重病患者进行了对氧目标和临床结果的系统审查。从1946年到2017年,我们搜索了Ovid Medline,Cochrane图书馆,Embase和科学核心系列网站。我们的初始搜索产生了14,774篇文章,并在抽象审查后剩余209篇。我们审查了具有兴趣条件,氧暴露或测量和临床结果的人类受试者的全文文章,以及缩小审查到43篇文章。我们使用建议,评估,开发和评估(等级)标准进行评分评估文章质量。结果:43项最终研究会议纳入标准,17名重点关注创伤和26项,专注于医疗和/或外科危重疾病的研究,没有创伤。四项创伤研究支持较低的氧合/常氧,两个支持的更高的氧合,11个均不氧氧化,也不高氧合(五种中性和六次支持的缺氧)。十五条重症疾病研究支持较低的氧合/常氧,一个负载较高的氧合,10个常见的氧化也不高,氧合(九个中性和缺氧的一个支持的避免)。我们确定了七项随机对照试验(四种高品质,三种中等质量)。在高质量的随机对照试验(无创伤相关)中,一个支持的氧化/常氧和三种是中性的。中等质量的随机对照试验(一个创伤相关的),一个支持更高的氧合,一种是中性的,并且一个支持的缺氧避免。结论:我们确定了一些超越创伤性脑损伤的特异性研究;没有高品质。主要来自非法统治疾病,减少氧气给药靶向常氧的临床患者可能导致更好或等同的临床结果。需要额外的创伤特异性试验来确定患者患者的最佳氧气策略。证据水平:系统评价,IV级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号