首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Should they stay or should they go? Who benefits from interfacility transfer to a higher-level trauma center following initial presentation at a lower-level trauma center
【24h】

Should they stay or should they go? Who benefits from interfacility transfer to a higher-level trauma center following initial presentation at a lower-level trauma center

机译:他们应该留下还是应该去? 谁在初级创伤中心初始介绍后,从接口转移到更高级别的创伤中心的益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Interfacility transfer of patients from Level III/IV to Level I/II (tertiary) trauma centers has been associated with improved outcomes. However, little data are available classifying the specific subsets of patients that derive maximal benefit from transfer to a tertiary trauma center. Drawbacks to transfer include increased secondary overtriage. Here, we ask which injury patterns are associated with improved survival following interfacility transfer. METHODS Data from the National Trauma Data Bank was utilized. Inclusion criteria were adults (>= 16 years). Patients with Injury Severity Score of 10 or less or those who arrived with no signs of life were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those admitted to a Level III/IV trauma center versus those transferred into a tertiary trauma center. Multiple imputation was performed for missing values, and propensity scores were generated based on demographics, injury patterns, and disease severity. Using propensity score-stratified Cox proportional hazards regression, the hazard ratio for time to death was estimated. RESULTS Twelve thousand five hundred thirty-four (5.2%) were admitted to Level III/IV trauma centers, and 227,315 (94.8%) were transferred to a tertiary trauma center. Patients transferred to a tertiary trauma center had reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; p < 0.001). We identified that patients with traumatic brain injury with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13, pelvic fracture, penetrating mechanism, solid organ injury, great vessel injury, respiratory distress, and tachycardia benefited from interfacility transfer to a tertiary trauma center. In this sample, 56.8% of the patients benefitted from transfer. Among those not transferred, 49.5% would have benefited from being transferred. CONCLUSION Interfacility transfer is associated with a survival benefit for specific patients. These data support implementation of minimum evidence-based criteria for interfacility transfer.
机译:背景技术III / IV级至I / II水平(第三级)创伤中心的患者的接触转移与改善的结果有关。然而,很少的数据可以分类为从转移到三级创伤中心导出最大益处的患者的特定子集。转移的缺点包括增加的二级习惯。在这里,我们询问哪些损伤模式与接口转移后改善的存活相关。方法采用国家创伤数据库的数据。纳入标准是成年人(> = 16岁)。患者患者严重程度得分10或更少或者那些没有生命迹象的人被排除在外。患者分为两个队列:参加III水平/ IV创伤中心的那些与转移到第三级创伤中心的人。对缺失值进行多重估算,基于人口统计,损伤模式和疾病严重程度产生倾向分数。利用倾向得分分层的Cox比例危险回归,估计死亡时间的危险比。结果12万五百三十四(5.2%)进入III级/静脉创伤中心,227,315(94.8%)转移到高等创伤中心。转移到三级创伤中心的患者降低了死亡率(危害比,0.69; p <0.001)。我们认为创伤性脑损伤的患者与Glasgow昏迷的比例得分小于13,盆腔骨折,穿透机制,固体器官损伤,血管损伤,呼吸窘迫和心动过速,从接口转移到三级创伤中心受益。在该样品中,56.8%的患者受益于转移。在未转让的人中,49.5%会受益于转移。结论接口转移与特定患者的生存益处有关。这些数据支持实施最小的基于证据的基于依据标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号