...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Trauma Hemostasis and Oxygenation Research Network position paper on the role of hypotensive resuscitation as part of remote damage control resuscitation
【24h】

Trauma Hemostasis and Oxygenation Research Network position paper on the role of hypotensive resuscitation as part of remote damage control resuscitation

机译:创伤止血和氧合研究网络位置纸对低血压复苏的作用作为远程损伤控制复苏的一部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Trauma Hemostasis and Oxygenation Research (THOR) Network has developed a consensus statement on the role of permissive hypotension in remote damage control resuscitation (RDCR). A summary of the evidence on permissive hypotension follows the THOR Network position on the topic. In RDCR, the burden of time in the care of the patients suffering from noncompressible hemorrhage affects outcomes. Despite the lack of published evidence, and based on clinical experience and expertise, it is the THOR Network's opinion that the increase in prehospital time leads to an increased burden of shock, which poses a greater risk to the patient than the risk of rebleeding due to slightly increased blood pressure, especially when blood products are available as part of prehospital resuscitation. The THOR Network's consensus statement is, "In a casualty with life-threatening hemorrhage, shock should be reversed as soon as possible using a blood-based HR fluid. Whole blood is preferred to blood components. As a part of this HR, the initial systolic blood pressure target should be 100mm Hg. In RDCR, it is vital for higher echelon care providers to receive a casualty with sufficient physiologic reserve to survive definitive surgical hemostasis and aggressive resuscitation. The combined use of blood-based resuscitation and limiting systolic blood pressure is believed to be effective in promoting hemostasis and reversing shock". Copyright (c) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:创伤止血和氧合研究(Thor)网络已经开发了关于允许低血压在远程损伤控制复苏(RDCR)中的作用的共识声明。允许低血压证据的摘要遵循Thor网络位置主题。在RDCR中,患有不容抑制出血的患者的照顾中的时间沉重会影响结果。尽管缺乏公布的证据,并根据临床经验和专业知识,它是Thor网络的看法,它的恢复时间的增加导致休克的负担增加,这对患者构成了患者的风险,而不是由于拒绝的风险略微增加血压,特别是当血液产品作为预复苏的一部分提供时。 Thor网络的共识声明是“在危及生命的出血的伤亡中,应尽快使用基于血液的人力流体来逆转休克。全血优于血液成分。作为本人的一部分,最初收缩压靶标应为100mm Hg。在RDCR中,对于更高的梯度护理提供者来说,对于患有足够的生理储备来造成伤亡,以存活明确的外科止血和侵略性复苏,这是至高的。结合使用血基复苏和限制收缩压的结合使用和限制收缩压被认为有效地促进止血和逆转休克“。版权所有(c)2018 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 》 |2018年第6suppla期| 共11页
  • 作者单位

    Royal Ctr Def Med Acad Dept Mil Anaesthet &

    Crit Care Birmingham W Midlands England;

    THOR Steering Comm UK Paramed Glasgow Lanark Scotland;

    Def Sci &

    Technol Lab Combat Casualty Care Med &

    Trauma Sci Porton Down Wilts England;

    16 Med Regiment Colchester Essex England;

    Val de Grace Mil Acad Anaesthesia &

    Intens Care Paris France;

    McGill Univ Royal Canadian Med Serv Montreal PQ Canada;

    Haukeland Hosp Dept Anaesthesia &

    Intens Care Bergen Norway;

    US Army Coagulat &

    Blood Res Inst Surg Res San Antonio TX USA;

    Univ Leicester Emergency Med Leicester Leics England;

    Univ Colorado Sch Med Surg Aurora CO USA;

    Univ Colorado Hlth Paramed NREMT Columbus OH USA;

    Univ Colorado Hlth Trauma Acute Care Surg Denver CO USA;

    NHS Blood &

    Transplant Transfus Med Watford England;

    UT Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio TX USA;

    UT Hlth Sci Ctr Dept Surg San Antonio TX USA;

    Bar Ilan Univ Fac Med Israel Def Forces Med Corps Safed Israel;

    Royal Devon &

    Exeter NHS Fdn Trust Peninsula Trauma Network Exeter Devon England;

    UT Hlth San Antonio Div Trauma &

    Emergency Surg San Antonio TX USA;

    Special Operat Command Europe Stuttgart Germany;

    French Mil Blood Inst Transfus Med &

    Cell Therapy Clamart France;

    Univ Colorado Ranger Regiment 75 Denver CO 80202 USA;

    Univ Colorado Ranger Regiment 75 Denver CO 80202 USA;

    Royal Ctr Def Med Mil Anaesthesia Birmingham W Midlands England;

    French Armed Forces Inst Biomed Res Combat Casualty Care Toulon France;

    Acute Care Surg Toulon France;

    Univ Queensland Mil Med &

    Surg Australian Def Force Joint Hlth Command &

    Fac Med Brisbane Qld;

    Univ St Andrews Sch Med Intervent Cardiol Acute &

    Prehospital Med St Andrews Fife Scotland;

    Royal Ctr Def Med Dept Mil Surg &

    Trauma Birmingham W Midlands England;

    Oregon Hlth &

    Sci Univ Div Trauma Crit Care &

    Acute Care Surg Portland OR USA;

    Univ Bergen Dept Def Joint Trauma Syst Bergen Norway;

    Univ Bergen Norwegian Naval Special Operat Commando Bergen Norway;

    Royal Ctr Def Med Dept Emergency Med Birmingham W Midlands England;

    Washington Univ Sch Med Dept Pediat St Louis MO 63110 USA;

    Norwegian Armed Forces Med Serv Dept Immunol &

    Transfus Med Oslo Norway;

    Univ Michigan Dept Emergency Med Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA;

    Def Sci &

    Techol Lab Combat Casualty Care Med &

    Trauma Sci Salisbury Wilts England;

    Washington Univ Med Div Emergency Med Seattle WA USA;

    Def Sci &

    Techol Lab Combat Casualty Care Med &

    Trauma Sci Salisbury Wilts England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号