首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is associated with improved survival in trauma-related hemorrhage: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis
【24h】

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is associated with improved survival in trauma-related hemorrhage: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis

机译:四因素凝血酶凝血酶复合物浓缩物与创伤相关出血中的提高生存有关:全国倾向匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION Post-traumatic hemorrhage is the most common preventable cause of death in trauma. Numerous small single-center studies have shown the superiority of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) along with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) over FFP alone in resuscitation of trauma patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes of severely injured trauma patients who received 4-PCC + FFP compared to FPP alone. METHODS Two-year (2015-2016) analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All adult (age >= 18 years) trauma patients who received 4-PCC + FFP or FFP alone were included. We excluded patients who were on preinjury anticoagulants. Patients were stratified into two groups: 4-PCC + FFP versus FFP alone and were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, vitals, injury parameters, comorbidities, and level of trauma centers. Outcome measures were packed red blood cells, plasma and platelets transfused, complications, and mortality. RESULTS A total of 468 patients (4-PCC + FFP, 234; FFP alone, 234) were matched. Mean age was 50 +/- 21 years; 70% were males; median injury severity score was 27 [20-36], and 86% had blunt injuries. Four-PCC + FFP was associated with a decreased requirement for packed red blood cells (6 units vs. 10 units; p = 0.02) and FFP (3 units vs. 6 units; p = 0.01) transfusion compared to FFP alone. Patients who received 4-PCC + FFP had a lower mortality (17.5% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (1.3% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.04) and acute kidney injury (2.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the rates of deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.11) and pulmonary embolism (p = 0.33), adverse discharge disposition (p = 0.21), and platelets transfusion (p = 0.72) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that the use of 4-PCC as an adjunct to FFP is associated with improved survival and reduction in transfusion requirements compared to FFP alone in resuscitation of severely injured trauma patients. Further studies are required to evaluate the role of addition of PCC to the massive transfusion protocol.
机译:引言后创伤后出血是创伤中最常见的可预防原因。许多小单中心研究表明,四因素凝血酶体复合物浓缩物(4-PCC)以及单独使用FFP的新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)的优越性在创伤患者的复苏中。我们的研究目的是评估患有4-PCC + FFP的严重受伤的创伤患者的结果,而单独使用FPP。方法两年(2015 - 2016年)分析美国外科医学院 - 创伤质量改进计划数据库。所有成年人(年龄> = 18岁)包括单独接受4-PCC + FFP或FFP的创伤患者。我们排除了患有前矛凝血的患者。将患者分为两组:4-PCC + FFP与FFP单独,使用倾向评分与人口统计,损害,损伤参数,组合和创伤中心水平的倾向评分匹配的1:1的比率匹配。结果措施填充红细胞,血浆和血小板分发,并发症和死亡率。结果共匹配468名患者(4-PCC + FFP,234个; FFP,234)。平均年龄为50 +/- 21岁; 70%是男性;中位伤害严重程度得分为27 [20-36],86%的人患有钝伤。四-PCC + FFP与填充红细胞的需求减少有关(6个单位与10个单位; P = 0.02)和FFP(3个单位与6个单位; P = 0.01)输血,与单独的FFP相比。接受4-PCC + FFP的患者具有较低的死亡率(17.5%vs.27.7%,P = 0.01)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的较低率(1.3%对4.7%,P = 0.04)和急性肾损伤(2.1 %与7.3%,p = 0.01)。深静脉血栓形成(P = 0.11)和肺栓塞(P = 0.33),不利排出处理(P = 0.21)和两组之间的血小板输血(p = 0.72)的差异没有差异。结论我们的研究表明,与单独的FFP相比,使用4-PCC作为FFP的辅助FFP的辅助生存率和输血要求的辅助性有关。需要进一步的研究来评估将PCC添加到大规模输血方案中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号