首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Switching to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Initially Treated With Prasugrel or Ticagrelor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Switching to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Initially Treated With Prasugrel or Ticagrelor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:用普鲁西格或替纳昔治疗急性冠状动脉综合征治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者切换到氯吡格雷:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effects of switching from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients managed with percutaneous coronary intervention on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, bibliographies of relevant articles, and clinicaltrials.gov for eligible articles published from inception to January 27, 2019. Study Selection and Data Extraction: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and case-control studies that reported on >= 1 outcome of interest. Primary outcomes were MACE and major bleeding, and the secondary outcome was any bleeding. Data Synthesis: From 483 articles, we included 7 relevant studies (2 RCTs, 5 cohort studies) at high/unclear risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed inconclusive effects on MACE (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.59-1.68; I-2 = 82%), major bleeding (HR = 0.51; 0.19-1.35; I-2 = 91%), and any bleeding (HR = 0.64; 0.38-1.07; I-2 = 85%). Similar nonsignificant results were obtained in secondary analyses evaluating risk ratios. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Ticagrelor and prasugrel, are now considered preferred therapy over clopidogrel in patients with ACS. Switching from these potent P2Y(12) inhibitors to clopidogrel is commonly performed to reduce bleeding risk, other adverse effects, or costs. Current best-available evidence is inconclusive regarding the effects of switching to clopidogrel on the risk of MACE and bleeding. Overall, studies were underpowered to detect clinically important differences. Conclusions: Until adequately powered trials demonstrate an advantage to switching to clopidogrel from prasugrel or ticagrelor, clinicians may consider this approach as clinically indicated on an individual, case-by-case basis.
机译:目的:评价从急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者在经皮冠状动脉介入对主要不良心血管事件(甘蓝队)和出血中进行急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中氯吡格雷对氯吡格雷的影响。数据来源:我们搜索了相关文章的Medline,Embase,Central,Centrine,Clinicaltrials.gov作为从初期到2019年1月27日发布的符合条件的文章。学习选择和数据提取:我们包括随机对照试验(RCT)和队列和诉讼-Control研究报告> = 1兴趣的结果。主要结果是坐垫和重大出血,次要结果是任何出血。数据合成:从483篇文章中,我们包括7个相关研究(2个RCT,5个队列研究),高/不明确的偏见风险。随机效应Meta分析显示对术术的不确定影响(危险比[HR] = 1.00,95%CI = 0.59-1.68; I-2 = 82%),重大出血(HR = 0.51; 0.19-1.35; I-2 = 91%)和任何出血(HR = 0.64; 0.38-1.07; I-2 = 85%)。在评估风险比率的二次分析中获得了类似的不显着性结果。与患者护理和临床实践的相关性:TiCagreloLor和Prasugrel,现在被认为是ACS患者氯吡格雷的优选治疗。通常进行从这些有效的P2Y(12)抑制剂转换为氯吡格雷,以减少出血风险,其他不利影响或成本。目前的最佳证据是对切换到氯吡格雷对钉锤子和出血风险的影响不确定。总体而言,研究受到临床上的重要差异。结论:在充分动力的试验中表现出从普拉布雷或TiCagrelel转换为氯吡格雷的优势,临床医生可以认为这种方法在临床上表明,逐案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号