首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >The Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Medication Overuse Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Medication Overuse Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:治疗药物过度使用头痛治疗的有效性:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Worldwide, approximately 1 to 2% of the adult population suffers from chronic headache due to overuse of pain medication. Guidelines recommend acute withdrawal of medication, but the optimal treatment remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of treatments for patients with medication overuse headache (MOH). We performed an extensive literature search until November 2015, selecting randomized controlled trials that evaluated interventions for adults with MOH. Two authors assessed the eligible trials and extracted data. We calculated effect estimates and used the random effects model for the pooled analysis. Our primary outcome measures were 'headache days' and 'days with medication.' Outcome data were categorized as short-term (up to 12 weeks) or long-term (>= 12 weeks) outcomes. This review consists of 16 trials including 1,105 patients. Four trials evaluated the use of prednisone with placebo or celecoxib after medication withdrawal; 7 trials evaluated various methods of withdrawal versus other methods of withdrawal, and 5 trials evaluated prophylactic medication compared with placebo or ibuprofen. We found no significant differences in headache days between prednisone versus placebo or between outpatient versus inpatient treatment, but we found a significant difference in days with medication. Overall, we found no benefit of prophylactic medication versus placebo. We found low to very low quality of evidence of no benefit of prednisone, prophylaxis, and various withdrawal interventions. Because the burden of MOH for patients is enormous, larger and high-quality intervention trials are needed.
机译:全球范围内,由于过度使用止血药物,大约1%至2%的成年人口患有慢性头痛。指导方针建议急性戒断药物,但最佳治疗仍然未知。我们旨在评估治疗药物过度使用头痛(MOH)的患者的益处。我们在2015年11月进行了广泛的文献搜索,选择了随机对照试验,评估了莫赫的成年人的干预措施。两位作者评估了符合条件的试验和提取数据。我们计算了效果估计并使用了汇总分析的随机效应模型。我们的主要结果措施是“头痛日”和“患有药物的日子”。结果数据被分类为短期(最多12周)或长期(> = 12周)结果。该审查由16项试验组成,包括1,105名患者。四项试验评估使用泼尼松与安慰剂或Celecoxib在药物撤离后使用; 7试验评估了各种戒断方法与其他戒断方法,以及5种试验评估了预防性药物,与安慰剂或布洛芬相比。我们发现泼尼松与安慰剂之间的头痛日或门诊与住院治疗之间没有显着差异,但我们发现患有药物的天数差异。总体而言,我们发现预防性药物与安慰剂没有任何好处。我们发现低于泼尼松,预防和各种戒断的益处的低质量证据。由于莫赫患者的负担是巨大的,需要更大,更高质量的干预试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号