首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >Operant Learning Versus Energy Conservation Activity Pacing Treatments in a Sample of Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Operant Learning Versus Energy Conservation Activity Pacing Treatments in a Sample of Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:操作学习与节能活性起搏治疗在纤维肌痛综合征患者样本中:飞行员随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study's aim was to assess the efficacy of 2 forms of activity pacing in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Treatment-related changes in activity management patterns were also examined. Patients with FMS (n = 178) were randomly assigned to an operant learning (OL; delayed [n = 36] or immediate [n = 54] groups) or an energy conservation (EC; delayed [n = 35] or immediate [n = 53] groups) treatment condition. Of these, 32 OL and 37 EC patients completed treatment. Forty-three patients were allocated to the delayed treatment condition (control group). Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine the effects of OL and EC treatments on primary (average pain and usual fatigue), secondary (pain and fatigue interference, physical and psychological function, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms), and tertiary (pain-related activity patterns) outcomes. Neither treatment was effective in reducing average pain or usual fatigue symptoms. Relative to EC, OL patients showed greater improvements in depressive symptoms, whereas nonsignificant trends (P values ranging between .05 and .06) were observed for pain interference, fatigue interference, and psychological function. Both treatments were associated with improvements in sleep quality and physical function, increases in pacing, and decreases in over doing activity patterns. Reductions in activity avoidance were only found in OL. These findings suggest that OL may be more beneficial than EC and that it could potentially be viewed as an effective stand-alone activity pacing treatment for patients with FMS. Research to determine the extent to which these preliminary findings replicate is warranted.
机译:本研究的目的是评估纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者2种形式的活性起搏的疗效。还检查了活动管理模式的治疗相关变化。随机分配FMS(n = 178)的患者(OL;延迟[n = 36]或立即[n = 54]组)或节能(EC;延迟[n = 35]或立即[n = 53]组)治疗条件。其中32℃和37例EC患者完成治疗。将四十三名患者分配给延迟治疗条件(对照组)。反复措施的差异分析用于检查OL和EC治疗对初级(平均疼痛和常规疲劳)的影响,继发(疼痛和疲劳干扰,身体和心理功能,睡眠质量,抑郁症状和焦虑症状),以及第三节(与疼痛相关的活动模式)结果。治疗既不有效降低平均疼痛或通常的疲劳症状。相对于EC,OL患者对抑郁症状的提高表现出更大的改善,而疼痛干扰,疲劳干扰和心理功能,观察到抑郁症状的改善这两种治疗与睡眠质量和物理功能的改善有关,起搏的增加,并在做活动模式过度减少。在OL中仅发现活动避免的减少。这些发现表明,OL可能比EC更有益,并且它可能被视为FMS患者的有效独立的活性起搏治疗。研究确定有必要进行这些初步发现复制的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号