...
首页> 外文期刊>The American heart journal >Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
【24h】

Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

机译:完全试验的设计与理由:随机,比较有效性研究完全与罪魁祸首的经皮冠状动脉介入,以治疗患有ST段抬高心肌梗死的患者患者多型冠状动脉疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction A significant proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Following successful culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI, the question of whether to routinely revascularize non-culprit lesions or manage them conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone is a common dilemma facing clinicians.
机译:引言患有ST段升高的患者的大量比例患者(STEMI)具有多血糖冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。 在成功的罪魁祸首病变经皮冠状动脉干预(PCI)之后,对于单独的最佳医疗治疗(OMT)常规血管内容术语术语术语是常规血运性病的问题是一个面向临床医生的常见困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号