【24h】

Normative Concerns with High-Risk Pools

机译:具有高风险池的规范性问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite a significant amount of literature debating the efficiency of high-risk pools in health insurance, dramatically less has been written about their normative implications. The present article takes the route less traveled by setting aside the question of efficiency to argue that the use of high-risk pools creates some serious normative concerns. The article explores these concerns by dividing them on two fronts. First, as regards the social-recognitional status of those who are forced into the high-risk pool. Second, as regards a general concern of distributive justice, namely fairness in access to resources. The author argues that regardless of the veracity of arguments which laud the efficiency of high-risk pools, their use in health insurance is unjust because of the herein explained implications for social recognition and distributive justice.
机译:尽管有大量的文献辩论健康保险中高风险池的效率,但仍然对其规范意义进行了巨大较少。 本文通过抛开效率问题来缩短旅行的路线,以争辩说,使用高风险池的使用创造了一些严重的规范性问题。 这篇文章通过将它们划分在两个方面来探讨这些问题。 首先,关于那些被迫进入高风险游泳池的人的社会上卡状况。 其次,关于分配正义的一般关注,即获得资源的公平性。 作者认为,无论遵守高风险池效率的论据的真实性,他们在健康保险中的使用是不公正的,因为本文对社会承认和分配司法的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号