首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Surgical Management of Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Patellar Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Surgical Management of Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Patellar Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review

机译:同时前缘韧带和髌骨肌腱裂纹的手术管理:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study performs a systematic review to determine (1) if a significant difference exists in return to preinjury activity level between one- and two-stage treatment of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and patellar tendon (PT) tears; and (2) if a significant difference exists in the number of postoperative complications between the two differing surgical treatment approaches. A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and Sport Discus were searched for English language level I-IV evidence studies on either one- (simultaneous) or two-stage (sequential) surgical treatment of simultaneously sustained ipsilateral ACL and PT tears. The approach to initial evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were qualitatively analyzed. Methodological quality assessment of all included studies was completed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess quality of evidence and provide strength of recommendation. Statistical analyses were done using Fischer's exact test. Eleven articles (18 patients; 83% males; mean age, 31.1 +/- 10.1 years; mean follow-up, 2.2 +/- 1.7 years; and mean MINORS 7.8/16) were analyzed. Eight patients had a one-stage procedure (primary PT repair and ACL reconstruction), and 10 patients underwent a two-stage procedure (primary PT repair first followed by ACL reconstruction) with mean 28 +/- 45.7 weeks (5 weeks-3 years) between surgeries. The rate for return to preinjury activity level after surgery was not significantly different between one- (88%) and two-stage (100%) (p = 0.444). There was a significantly higher complication rate (p = 0.023) in the one-stage (stiffness, instability, and patella baja) versus two-stage surgery (no complications). There was no significant difference in return to preinjury activity level between one- and two-stage PT repair and ACL reconstruction. However, the one-stage combined surgery had a significantly higher complication rate compared with two-stage surgery. The level of evidence is IV.
机译:该研究进行系统审查以确定(1)如果存在显着差异,以恢复前九阶段治疗的前戊韧带(ACL)和髌腱(PT)撕裂; (2)如果两种不同的手术治疗方法之间的术后并发症的数量存在显着差异。使用首选报告项目进行系统审查,用于系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南并在Prospero上注册。搜索了对照试验,SCOPUS和体育椎间盘的MEDLINE,Cochrane中央登记册,用于英语语言水平I-IV证据研究,对同时持续的同侧ACL和PT撕裂的同时持续的IPSILATEAL治疗。定性地分析了初始评估,诊断,治疗和结果的方法。使用非随机研究的方法指标(未成年人)完成所有包括研究的方法论质量评估。建议,评估,开发和评估(等级)工具的评分用于评估证据质量并提供建议的实力。使用Fischer的确切测试完成统计分析。 11篇(18名患者);均值83%;平均年龄,31.1 +/- 10.1岁;平均随访,2.2 +/- 1.7岁;均均为未成年人7.8 / 16)。八名患者有一阶段程序(初级PT修复和ACL重建),10名患者经历了两阶段的手术​​(首先是ACL重建的原发性PT修复),平均28 +/- 45.7周(5周-3岁)手术之间。手术后返回前津属活性水平的速率在1-(88%)和两级(100%)之间没有显着差异(P = 0.444)。单阶段(刚度,不稳定和髌骨Baja)与两阶段手术(无并发症)存在明显较高的并发症率(p = 0.023)。恢复到一阶段PT修复与ACL重建之间的返回前津属活动水平没有显着差异。然而,与两阶段手术相比,单级联合手术具有明显更高的并发症率。证据水平是IV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号